this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
180 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32076 readers
1135 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 74 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 88 points 6 months ago (13 children)

I think that’s the point. You can’t trust the average developer to do things safely. And remember, half of all programmers are even worse than average.

[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 19 points 6 months ago

Maybe even more!

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that be the median programmer instead of average?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Half of all programmers constitute the so called "average" group

[–] Darkrai@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

If you have to ask

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yea! I'm one of them!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

Or rather a Dunning Kruger issue: seniors having spent a significant time architecturing and debugging complex applications tend to be big proponents for things like rust.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Guys, C++ is gonna be dead in a couple of years now. Remember this comment…

…and read it again in ten years.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Are you the guy who has been posting this same comment every 10 years over the last half century?

(Edit: is joke)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brunacho@scribe.disroot.org 32 points 6 months ago

Biden administration has fallen into the Rewrite it in Rust agenda.

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pretty crazy to reccomend Java as a secure alternative.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Why? What's wrong with safe, managed and fast languages?

[–] zik@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Java's runtime has had a large number of CVEs in the last few years, so that's probably a decent reason to be concerned.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Yep but:

  • it's one runtime, so patching a CVE patches it for all programs (vs patching each and every program individually)

  • graalvm is taking care of enabling java to run on java

[–] DampCanary@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Nothing...

Only that descrition doesn't include Java

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nothing really, the JVM has a pretty troubled history that would really make me hesitate to call it "safe". It was originally built before anyone gave much thought to security and that fact plauges it to the present day.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

and how much of this troubled history is linked to Java Applets/native browsers extensions, and how much of it is relevant today?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As you wish. Time to start learning D and D++

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Hey girl, would you like my D or D++?

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Is that nottheonion?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You mean like android running java which is why everyone and their mom bought Israel's Pegasus spyware toolkit?

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When was the last time you've heard of a memory safety issue in Java code? Not the runtime or some native library, raw dogged Java.

Memory safety isn't a silver bullet, but it practically erases an entire category of bugs.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Fair point, even log4j was running java code, not literally hijacking the stack or heap.

That being said, I'm poking fun because C and C++ have low level capabilities of which only Rust offers a complete alternative of. Most of everything else is safe because it comes packaged with a garbage collector which affects performance and viability. I think Go technically counts if you set the GC allocation to 0 and use pointers for everything, but might as well use Rust or C at that point.

I guess I'm just complaining out of all the issues ONCD could point out, they went after the very broad "memeory-safe is always better" when most of the people using C and C++ need the performance. They only offered Rust as a potential alternative in the report with nothing else which everyone already knows. Would be nice to see them make a real statement like telling megacorps to stop using unencrypted SCADA on the internet.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago

The apps are (sometimes) Java, but the OS is a mix of languages, mostly C and C++. The Java runtime itself is C++.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I love that Android chose Java so they could run it on different processor architectures, but in the end one architecture won out so Java wasn't necessary any more. I guess they didn't know at the time, but they'd claw back a tonne of efficiency if they dropped the Java VM.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Java also made it very accessible to the vast majority of existing Java developers.

Way more Java developers than Objective C developers at the time.

I wasn't a fan of learning Objective C when I started learning just as swift was coming out but too new to use.

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Meanwhile the report does not really single out C/C++

[–] Leeker@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

What are you talking about? Did you read the report? On page 7 They directly say that C/C++ "lack traits associated with memory safety".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When all the talented programmers are all gay communists and your entire state exists to murder gay communists. Still can't forget how Allen Turing, a gay man whose inventions were a gigantic help in winning WW2, KYS'd because they still treated him like garbage even after the fact.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also like it’s the only source of vulnerabilities… in addition a lot of the trendy python libs are developed in C; do we also ditch those?

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is one of the main sources. Like, actually a very substantial fraction is memory related. I think It was more than 50%, granted those are estimates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

Nice. Now I'm waiting for all the Rust or whatever "safe" languages environments for embedded systems to fall from the sky. And please some that actually work on small processors with little memories.

[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago

Rewrite it in Rust

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

That's probably a good idea but I can see some proper longevity issues in that one

[–] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

People are talking about Java, but the majority of programming languages are memory safe nowadays. Go satisfies this requirement, for example.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Shut up Brandon, you can’t even code. This is just propaganda from Big Rust.

[–] Batbro@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

I wanted you to know that I laughed and enjoyed this comment, ignore the haters 💛

load more comments
view more: next ›