this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

news

23560 readers
633 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is pure evil

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just don't get how they make money doing this.

  1. Buy a firm that's healthy and growing.

  2. Slash and burn until there's nothing left.

  3. Sell the corpse at a profit somehow or, in this case, declare bankruptcy.

And then the line goes up? Why? How? Where does the new money come from?!

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

As far as I understand, for publicly traded firms they just need to show significant reductions in operational costs and invested capital, what amounts to a "healthy" company because higher profits, and the share price goes up.

When the share price goes up, they get financing against the now higher share price (banks are where new money comes from), use that money to buy controlling shares in other companies, and repeat the process.

When the bare-bones operation shows that it can't do what it's supposed to do with fuck all resources, they let the company die, declare bankruptcy and use accounting tricks so the losses reduce their tax load.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay so:

  1. Artificially boost valuation by cutting costs to unsustainable levels.

  2. Take out a loan financed against the artificially valuable company.

  3. Abandon the company they financed the loan with when it inevitably dies.

So the bank is the one eating the loss while the private equity firm gets away with all the loan money?

How isn't this just bank fraud 😆

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The bank is getting paid regardless, because the money is invested in other companies with varying degrees of success (or at different stages of being gutted), or other financial vehicles that don't necessarily track actual company value accurately. I don't know that much about the financial part of it, but in my unfortunate experience with these kinds of shops they know not to piss off the banks.

It's like the meme with the two dudes exchanging a briefcase back and forth, "creating value"

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I guess the bank is okay with eating the loss on one slash and burn if it means they can get more return from other investments, but I definitely can't wrap my mind around it. It's like the bank is being robbed and deciding it's okay because the robbers are reinvesting the money they stole.

[–] Eris235@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup, good ol' vulture capitalism.

Make a corpse, pick its bones, and fly away to the next meal.

Shareholders 'in on it' can make a tidy profit too, so they don't care that their new CEO or owner or w/e has track records likes these. 'What's that? You killed the last five companies you bought?' Eyes bulge with looney toons dollar signs.

What more amazing is that people can look at this system and say "look buddy, you don't have to like it, but capitalism just works, unlike your gommunism bullshit."

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago

Even liberal economists complain that this business model produces no value and should be discouraged. But capitalism machine goes brrr, I guess.