this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

askchapo

22849 readers
221 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending the current US healthcare system, it’s horrible and riddled with perverse incentives, and should be mostly (if not entirely) nationalized. I’m just not sure how to justify the idea that healthcare is a “right”.

I know that sometimes people on the left draw a comparison to the right to a public defender. I’m not sure that argument really holds up though, because you only have the right to a public defender under the specific circumstance of being prosecuted by the government for a crime. The logic there is “if the government is going to significantly interfere with your life by arresting you and trying you for a crime, then it at least has to allow you to get legal defense from a qualified attorney, even if you need the government to pay for it.” There’s not, like, a right to a publicly paid lawyer for any and all purposes.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Depending on how much of a nerd they invite you to be about it, all rights (and all life as members of a social species, really) require the labor of others to uphold and defend / perpetuate the continued existence of, but since usually this is more about some idea of doctors and nurses being forced to work without pay, usually it suffices to just point out that medical staff is still compensated in every nation with public healthcare.

More broadly though, I prefer to dodge "rights talk" entirely. "Is this a right? What about this?" I don't give a shit, rights are made up, and often the "rights discourse" serves only to distract from the more useful discussion of whether or not something would actually be good policy or not. Forget "rights", just consider: how much do you want life to suck ass to live in?