this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
52 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

1224 readers
83 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Instagram never directly told users it was limiting political content by default.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thantik@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Thank god. Half the population isn't smart enough to engage with it. If they're smart enough to turn access to it back on, then they pass the test.

Political content was the rage-bait that caused so many people to go down this hole of brainwashing that led them turning into weird-ass Qanon folk. It would be better if people had to search this out specifically.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that's probably the main differentiator between Instagram and the hellhole that is Facebook.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Have you requested this feature from the lemmy devs? This place is 75% rage bait politics and fuck cars.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

This place is too small for something like that to be practical, and operates in an insanely different way than Insta/TikTok, etc. We don't follow people here, we follow subjects.

[–] Shouted@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you’re a normal functioning human being then seeing less political news on social media is a good thing.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that should be your choice to make, not Facebook.

[–] Shouted@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

And you’re free to change it. It’s simply a default. What’s your problem?

Don’t like that it’s a default? Don’t use threads. Pretty simple decision making well adjusted humans are capable of doing.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The issue is not with Threads. The issue is with existing service Instagram, adding new settings and setting a default to exclude previously existing content. It's equivalent to Lemmy disabling all feed and limiting you to local, while saying you are free to change in the settings.

[–] Detectorist@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

This is why tiktok is so dangerous to the status quo, and why people are drawn to it.