this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2021
1 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22753 readers
429 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pursuit of Happyness (2006) has to be up there. Literally glorifies the stock market and presents a finance bro job as the key to happiness. There's a scene near the start where Will Smith is outside the NYSE looking at all the suits going in and out and narrating how he was inspired by how happy everyone was, and how this inspired him to bootlick his way into some internship, the pursuit of which literally requires him to alienate his friends and family and sleep in subway bathrooms with his five-year-old son. Everyone in the movie is a lazy, unscrupulous asshole, except for the rich people, of course, who are portrayed as generous and open-minded for allowing Will Smith in the door after he kisses their asses the whole movie. All of his struggle with homelessness and poverty etc. is portrayed not as injustice but as the ideal scenario, rewarding the hardest, most dedicated worker with a job. It is literally r/upliftingnews: the movie.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mittens@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

boss baby. How can a baby be a boss. Deranged ultraliberal shit

[–] sandinista209@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Anything Sorkin related. Trial of the Chicago 7 comes to mind recently.

[–] DasKarlBarx@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

That movie sucked so fucking hard.

Imagine making Abbie fucking Hoffman say "The system is fine it's just filled with bad people". :agony-immense:

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

Aaron Sorkin and putting his words in the mouths or revolutionaries and minorities, name a better duo.

[–] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Bulworth was Sorkin though. Exception proves the rule.

Edit: Bulworth, not Canadian Bacon

[–] wombat@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

The Lion King features animals literally bowing down in subservience to the animals that eat them, and this is explicitly justified in the movie, because monarchs eating their subjects is just the "circle of life"

[–] FidelCashflow@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

I saw it in theaters and it wa wild. Somehoe seeing the animals in realistic cgi really drove it home to me. No one I was at the Dennys with after the film got with it though.

I ask you though. After an undetermined period of Scar's managemnt does not the savanna thrive? The lions complain they are not allowed the riches they once enjoyed. But fuck em. Fucking disney makes a movie about a strong African woman protecting her people and it works. Then tells us we aren't supposed to be hapoy it worked