this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
234 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2333 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As civilian casualties continue to mount in the wartorn Gaza Strip, reports of Israel's use of artificial intelligence (AI) in its targeting of Hamas militants are facing increasing scrutiny. A report by the Israeli outlets +972 Magazine and Local Call earlier this month said that Israeli forces had relied heavily on two AI tools so far in the conflict — "Lavender" and "Where's Daddy."

While "Lavender" identifies suspected Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) militants and their homes, "Where's Daddy" tracks these targets and informs Israeli forces when they return home, per the report, which cites six Israeli intelligence officers who had used AI systems for operations in Gaza, including "Where's Daddy?"

"We were not interested in killing [Hamas] operatives only when they were in a military building or engaged in a military activity," one of the officers told +972 and Local Call. "On the contrary, the IDF bombed them in homes without hesitation, as a first option. It's much easier to bomb a family's home. The system is built to look for them in these situations," they added.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 120 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Who the fuck names a program like that "Where's Daddy?" that's fucking sociopathic.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 56 points 7 months ago

Yes - it is sociopathic.

That's not a coincidence.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The type of person who is intentionally targeting children to murder. I know, what a first for Israel...

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago

Really makes me wonder what the meaning behind Lavender is in this context. There could quite easily be some horrific intention behind using that specific word in correlation to this murder system.

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago

Israel

For them? This is tame.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If they designed the peogrm to be used to target people in their reaidentiak homes with their families, sociopaths is probably a good guess.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Every sane country on earth: "We use modern tools to reduce civilian casualties (because civilian casualties are bad PR)."

Old-school countries: "We use modern tools without regard for civilian casualties (because what are they going to do about it? fight back? lmao)"

Israel and Russia: "We use modern tools to INCREASE civilian casualties!"

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

The civilian casualty count in Gaza is already higher than Ukraine. As bad as Russia is, they’re nothing in comparison to Israel.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So you don't blow up their entire family, right? 😟

[–] Jamil@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nope! And 'susected Hamas militants' are any male that changed addresses or changed phones 'too often'.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Could have stopped at "male".

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

…..Oh shit I’m late for my colonics treatment

[–] anas@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

They can’t fight Hamas on the field, they have to assassinate them in other countries (funny how the best intelligence in the world knows exactly who the “Qatar billionaires” are but hasn’t done anything about it), murder them alongside their families while they sleep, or disguise as civilians to murder them in hospitals. Or the usual, take their frustration out on civilians.

[–] alternative_factor@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Really appreciating Israels SkyNet 100% speedrun here, some really impressive moves. However, I'm starting to wonder if this run passes the suspect test, I feel like you can't get past regulators so well in most cases without an exploit.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Spoiler: step one was to remove the regulators

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

"AI" in this context only serves to obfuscate responsibility. "You've just striked a bunch of children", "Well, sure, but this AI-generated model predicted that there was a 80% chance that they were all little Hamaslings". Of course, the data that AI was trained with was bollocks to ensure everyone is Hamas, including NGO kitchen foreign workers.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

at home

confusedtravolta.gif