this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
104 points (78.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

37136 readers
1289 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
104
Removed by mod (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by lana_del_rio@sh.itjust.works to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

The real shower thought: Some thoughts are better than others.

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Better shower thought: When the rich push the cost of housing high enough that a good portion of a society is one or two crises away from being homeless the best economic policy for fixing the situation is making the rich scared as fuck so whatever compromise we put on the table looks much more appealing than what the general public is threatening to do to the rich in the streets.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've already had my one crisis. If I have another I'll be fucked. Where do we start?

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think anything meaningful has to start from local mutual aid networks, creates connections with your neighbors under the assumption that we need to take care of each other, we can’t assume the system will be functional.

Even if your goal isn’t directly to organize locally, it is a prerequisite to getting pretty much anything meaningful done (which I kind of hate because when people call it “organizing” they aren’t kidding, and I hate organizing things lol) because whatever meaningful thing you want to happen will inevitably be implemented on a human level through those local connections.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand how that changes anything. It’s not 1872. You’re not just going to take all their gold and run. It’s already entrusted to the next billionaire-to-be in their living will. The wealth inequality continues, and you go to prison for homicide.

What am I missing?

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What you are missing is that you think I am suggesting stochastic terrorism or something. That doesn’t scare the rich, they can always build a bigger fence and pay more security guards.

What scares the rich is when they see that the fault lines they are using to vent steam (redirect the suffering and anger) are beginning to close into a wall of solidarity, and we are beginning to realize that as much as we despise each other and can’t agree on religion, ideologies, values… whatever… that we realize that none of that matters until we all deal with the rich people problem.

Solidarity and a direct understanding of the class war we are in is what scares the rich.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can be a famously witty cynic without living in a barrel.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

But what if you're really good at living in a barrel

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've already tried it, thanks, but no thanks.

[–] ElCanut@jlai.lu 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Would you say were you homelessnessing at a pro level or more at a hobby level ?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's more of a lifestyle.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Speaking from experience I was terrible at it. I was very good at being similar to Diogenes, but I can’t sleep well without a bed and it makes me bitchy

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

what if the one thing you'd be good at objectively sucks?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not really something i would aspire to. Spent my childhood couch surfing and living in my moms green stationwagon. Not something to brag about in any view

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

If you’re housed I’ll trade you my current situation so you can test that for yourself.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have this thought regularly. I realize. I'm too industrious. I'd be so great at being homeless I'd end up with a home..

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

"Too industrious" to be homeless sounds like nonsense victim-blaming to me. Homeless people aren't all lazy, and lazy people definitely aren't all homeless. It's a societal failing, not a personal one.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

A ~~barrel~~ large ceramic jar?

In this economy, in this part of the city, where continuously existing outside is illegal?

[–] leaveWitX@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

amazing,This is really a question worth pondering

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Never again

Straight from the showers at RNC headquarters