this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
291 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (36 children)

Knew he would do something in the election year. It's the one thing all Americans agree on.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s pretty important to bust monopolies, I’d say

[–] thirteene@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Utilities, healthcare, debt, education, foreign aid, environment, tech spyware, freedom of the Internet, insurrection. I got depressed and stopped listing things... I am happy for any kind of a win, but I stopped giving ticketmaster money in 2007. This is so overdue, it's only becoming a priority because Biden thinks he can win over swifties. It's hard to pretend that this should be a priority, at least free us from cable monopolies first.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

I think "win over swifties" is a big reductionist. It will certainly help get the attention of apathetic young voters and dinks, though.

It's also a bit of low-hanging fruit compared to the rest of them. Literally all the rest of them have massive lobbies backing them.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Great now he just has to tackle overpriced cars, and ban corporate home ownership.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Honestly, I care far more about untangling our rat's nest of NIMBY land use laws. As it stands, it's literally illegal to build anything denser than sprawling, low-density suburbs on the majority of urban land thanks to NIMBY policies such as restrictive zoning and arbitrary mandatory parking minimums.

Tbh, the whole "corporate ownership of homes" is a red herring. Shuffling around ownership does nothing if you're not massively expanding supply. And what we need most right now is massively expanded supply.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To add to this Science Vs did a podcast on the lack of affordable housing. It goes into the NIMBYs, the corporate ownership, local laws that make it hard to build multi-family units, and AirBnB. There are a lot of different factors and it might take time to see the results of fixing it because of this.

https://gimletmedia.com/shows/science-vs/emhwebz4?utm_source=gimletWebsite&utm_medium=copyShare&utm_campaign=gimletWebsite

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mPony@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

ban corporate home ownership

ban corporate home ownership

ban corporate home ownership

ban corporate home ownership

:)

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


When tickets first went on sale for her highly anticipated Eras Tour in November 2022, fans agonized over hours-long queues and frozen screens before Ticketmaster’s website ultimately crashed.

Ticketmaster’s failure to adequately prepare for that onslaught of demand by underinvesting in the customer purchase experience might have constituted an abuse of its market power, some economists pointed out.

“The Justice Department should have never cleared the [Live Nation-Ticketmaster] merger, because as a vertically integrated monopoly, they have every interest in encouraging prices and fees to go up, and there is no [one] in a position to discipline the industry, either by using an alternative promoter or ticketing agent,” said Tim Wu, a key architect of the Biden administration’s antitrust policies and a professor at Columbia Law.

Regardless of how the DOJ frames its lawsuit, it will have to show that Live Nation Entertainment has engaged in anti-competitive behavior that has stifled competition and hurt consumers by excessively raising prices or offering products of inferior quality.

Some experts, like Fiona Scott Morton, a professor at Yale School of Management and former chief economist at the DOJ’s antitrust division, think the government may have a strong case.

“Ticketmaster is pointing at the undeniable power of others to obscure its own monopolistic role in facilitating the extraordinary growth in both fees and also, to some extent, ticket prices,” Wu said.


The original article contains 1,148 words, the summary contains 227 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Standards are low. So so so low...

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Obviously the only real issue the american government is capable of tackling.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cool but like... Gaza? When are you going to do something for Palestine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›