this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
355 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2588 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the way things have always been. Use a word to classify something, and it'll be quickly turned into an insult and/or slur.

Words like "idiot" were originally medical terms used to describe those with mental illness or special needs. Then people started using it to insult people they didn't like. And every replacement quickly gets similar treatment. When I was growing up, the term "Mentally retarded" was the preferred and most common term to use. Then people hijacked it and turned it into a general-purpose insult. Today, the word "Special" is getting similar treatment. And whatever term will become the new acceptable term will get the same treatement in short order.

The same happens with race. Every classification of race eventually gets devolved and turned into a racial slur. And then when they start using a new term to describe them, the racists quickly turn that into a slur as well. This will be no different. Just like they did before, bigots have once again taken a general purpose term and turned it into an insult. And if it gets bad enough where people have to start renaming their DE&I departments and programs, whatever term is used to replace DE&! will be given the same treatment.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A professor I had in undergrad once use the term “vernacular treadmill” to describe that process. It just keeps spinning and we have to update what we define as insulting as it becomes used that way.

[–] soba@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yep, first they used 'political correctness' then it was 'SJW', then 'virtue signaling', and now 'woke'. They're all trying to say the same thing; that people on the left don't actually believe the things they say but feel pressured to conform to... something? A media narrative? A desire to not be perceived as a total asshole? But we're all totally fakers.

They've been using woke for awhile now, I guess it's DEI's turn.

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

It’s because there’s very little they truly believe in, so when they see people on the left have actual convictions they assume they’re liars just like themselves.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

They're all trying to say the same thing; that people on the left don't actually believe the things they say but feel pressured to conform to... something? A media narrative? A desire to not be perceived as a total asshole? But we're all totally fakers.

Every

Accusation

Is

An

Admission

[–] itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

"Euphemism Treadmill" on Wikipedia. Very interesting subject!

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Quite possible that’s what he said or possible he misspoke by accident.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh boy! It's "Cultural Marxism" all over again. I wonder if an incel somewhere is going to use this as a justification for committing mass murder, a la a certain Norwegian.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

DEI:PTSD::Cultural Marxism:Battle Fatigue::Political Correctness:Shell Shock

To borrow from ye olde SAT questions.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

This should have been a no brainer once these idiots started calling the Baltimore Mayor the "DEI mayor".

These racist, misogynistic, homophobic, and anti-Semitic/islamophobic assholes are always looking for a new dog whistle to use or a new popular thing to corrupt, or even seemingly innocent things to corrupt.

Fuck Nazis and all of their allies and enablers.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

The racist dog whistle is now a racist air raid siren.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So Republicans are ok without wheelchair ramps being mandated, or wide doors, or handicap parking spots?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Yes. They actually really love complaining about those things "killing small businesses back in my home town"

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean… to be fair, they got the W on that one. Obviously the ADA was bipartisan but Bush signed it into law

BUT inclusion is different when you can’t infantalize the disabled. Now we’re talking about able bodied people who they can’t write off as insert insult or slur for people with disabilities here

[–] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The disabled community got that win. Bush was forcefed heaping piles of bad publicity by protesting disabled people. They worked damn hard to put that bill in front of him and apply the right kind of pressure to make sure he fucking signed. Sure, he took the win as the politicians always do but that win firmly belongs to the disabled community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobody could have seen this coming. /s

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Someone should probably tell the so-called "DEI Mayor." I think it was actually just a bunch of racists using that term, not people who just thought we had a dedicated DEI professional on city staff to champion diversity, equity, and inclusion.

He will be so shocked to learn it was racism the whole time.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because 'woke' doesn't have the same feel anymore.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Or the academic version: CRT (critical race theory). Remember when that was the rage among conservatives?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

It's like watching an addict keep going after harder and harder hits.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Before that it was cancel culture.

Before that it was virtue signalling.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's not much of a dog whistle if everyone can hear it.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago

Don’t expect them to understand how to use a dog whistle properly.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The hatred has become mainstream again. They don't have to hide it anymore.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Republicans are always in search of ways to cause Democrats to cede ground. And Democrats keep falling for it because they love to surrender and call it compromise.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

this sounded like the intention from the get go

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

They need to get their own 3 letter acronym. I suggest DIE. Disorder, Ignorance and Exhaustion, since these seem to be their top 3 exports.

load more comments
view more: next ›