this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
95 points (94.4% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2623 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A $61bn package of military aid for Ukraine could be signed off within days. So what weapons might it receive and what difference could they make in trying to stem Russian advances?

Air defence systems, mid to long-range missiles and artillery shells remain the most pressing weaponry needed by Ukraine. 

Here is where the US aid could go in these three areas.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Denmark, the Netherlands and the US expect to deliver the first of dozens of "Vipers" to Ukraine within months. The jets won't be a game-changer but another significant arrow in the quiver for Kyiv.

How do these compare to Russia's jet fighters?

Also-

Russia suuuuuuucks.

[–] tal 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ehhhhh.

For rocket artillery, Russia also has the Smerch:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BM-30_Smerch

With the appropriate munitions, that can do 200 km.

They're using a range number for the M777 for the Excalibur ammunition, 40 km, so it seems fair to compare it against other long-range munitions.

For tube artillery, Russia has the Pion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2S7_Pion

With the appropriate ammunition, WP says that can reach 47.5 km.

EDIT: Note, for completeness, that Ukraine also has both of these, and for both of these, accuracy is somewhat-limited.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I wanted to say the same. However GLSDB is being supplied in regular quantities now, so that has some more range. But comparing XR smart shells to normal munitions is just silly indeed.

At this point munition quantities is the issue for Ukraine, and munitions quality is the issue for Russia.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

it’s funny they show himars and compare it to the m270. It’s the same missile. The only difference is the launch platform. For some reason people think the f16 will be a game changer. It won’t. Might even be an issue since Ukraine has no experience using them. They require lot of support and better runways.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

We will know soon enough. The conga line of C130s will form around Tuesday afternoon.