this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
324 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s conspiracy theories, vitriolic language, and xenophobia have made her a darling of the right and a pariah on the left—and now, she’s gained admiration from Russian state television. 

Greene’s attempts to block aid to Ukraine, her criticisms of NATO, and her beliefs that the United States should withdraw from the alliance have drawn plaudits from TV hosts in Russia, The Daily Beast reported Friday.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 83 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I'm not sure she's a literal traitor but she is definitely a useful idiot.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 51 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I honestly think she’s dumb enough to do it for free

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly. I think it's just in her own short term interest, and that happens to align with foreign governments.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You guys sound like youre making cover for mtg. She's a ghoul.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

That's definitely not my intention. I agree that her actions are fucking mental.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

I don’t think it’s a cover to be stupid and malicious when you don’t need to be. She’s obviously a ghoul, just the dumbest one I’ve ever heard of

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

She makes a lot of money off the stock market. She's in it for the money. Hate and anger sells.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If she is promoting Kremlin propaganda, she is a traitor, IMHO. Unfortunately, she is likely protected under the first amendment.

She is so fucking stupid, she probably isn't getting paid to say the things she does. People like that already have a twisted sense of patriotism so she likely believes the horseshit she spews.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand that viewpoint, and I'm not saying she's any less of a problem just because I'm not willing to state that she's a literal traitor. She's obviously doing what she's doing, regardless of her reasons.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Being a traitor an odd thing to try and define in this case. She really couldn't be considered the ringleader in distributing misinformation and we probably can't get proof of any bribery. If anything, she is a victim of state sponsored propaganda. "Victim" is probably too strong of a word here, but it's possible.

Regardless, the Dunning-Kruger effect is in full force with that one. If she is commiting crimes, she probably isn't aware of it.

I think our differences in views can be explained by my belief that propaganda is a legitimate weapon. (That could probably be debated until the end of time, unfortunately.)

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I do also believe that propaganda is a weapon. I just don't know whether she's doing what she's doing in the service of anything but her own stupidity. There is, however, no questioning the fact that whatever the case she is useful to foreign interests. Something which shouldn't be taken lightly no matter what category we put her into.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

If she is promoting Kremlin propaganda, she is a traitor, IMHO. Unfortunately, she is likely protected under the first amendment.

This is the Congressional Oath of Office she would have had to take at swearing in:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The only difference here is that a useful idiot hasn’t been used yet.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

She reminds me of my mother. She can't be wrong.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

makes me respect the gold bar senator bit more when its framed this way. If you're going to support a foreign country you could at least have the self respect to get paid.

[–] silver13@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Its so incredibly obvious that Putin supports everything that will weaken USA/EU/NATO-"The West" in the long run, economically, politically, you name it. Everything that will disassemble these systems, make them more vulnerable to corruption, reduces the trust people have in them. How the hell do these ultra-"patriotic" right wingers not see this while Putin is so clear and outspoken about it?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 months ago

Some of them put their hands over their eyes, some squint a lot, others though stare into the headlights of the oncoming train.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

To answer your rhetorical question, because they are selling our country for a pittance. Look at this abomination's net worth before and after she is elected.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 42 points 7 months ago

Of course they do. They all work for the same boss.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

Rather than trying to turn the US into Russia 2.0, maybe she should just move to Russia and live the dream.

[–] Dreizehn@kbin.social 20 points 7 months ago

Give the fucking traitor, Greene, a one-way ticket to Muscoviteville and she can take the damn MAGATs with her.

[–] jobby 16 points 7 months ago

A nice prison cell awaits when her finances get brought to light.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Useful sub-idiot.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Haha, that was my guess even I saw the synopsis up there.

I've been saying the repubs are a fifth column for many, many years - even before Dozo the Clown came along and brought terrorists like Marj along with him. Even before they started using Putin shirtless on a horse as avatars (unironically).

And now it's right out there in the open. The cons HATE this country. Many have been able to see this for decades; now there is no hiding it.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Pig fucking conventions?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 12 points 7 months ago

That’s taking the term“useful idiot” somewhat more literally than usual

[–] LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

On Russian TV they said that she is very heterosexual and wears fur coats. I have no idea wtf this is supposed to mean.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Up her own asshole? Didn't think this was news, nor sudden.