I'm sorry but I don't understand the correlation.
I mean, let's, for a brief instant, accept that immigrants are eating pets. For a moment, let's consider that the nonsense claimed is true and some people are eating dogs or cats.
What are you achieving by making false bomb threats? What's the logic behind that? What are you solving by calling to say there's a bomb in the school? Will these threats stop people from eating cats? Will they solve the "problem" in any way?
They are pro-life, just not your life.
They saw the concept of a knife
It's a Pokémon. And so far, the only one with at least 4 types: water, poison, flying and electric. How the fuck can you even counter it?
Yes. That's very me. Too me.
Uh... Yes! I think.
They do make a serious point tho: getting to know for 4 years where the couch fucker freak is, is no small thing.
That lack of accountability, imho, comes from capitalism dictating what democracy can do, and not the other way around. In other countries, democracy limits what capitalism can do, so it's more or less subordinate to it.
In the US, capitalism decides what democracy can do, so it's actually democracy which is subordinated to capitalism.
Nonsense. The Cybertruck is absolutely trustworthy.
All you have to do is drive it on the roads, while it's sunny, possibly not dusty. And avoid any amount of water. ANY.
They don't care. After all, you know who's paying those lawsuits? Yep, you guessed right: taxpayers. So every NYC citizen is going to pay for what these fuckwads did.
I think the right question is why no one is succeeding?
We're living in a present where election officials of a democratic country need to prepare with bulletproof glass and panic buttons among the things to guarantee that election day goes smoothly. And somehow, the people responsible for this not only are free and doing their will, they are running for the government through that election.
And I am supposed to think that dystopian futures seen in the movies are somehow worse?