Allero

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Allero 27 points 1 week ago

Guess this is what happens when you meet real people online who are not artificially enraged - a productive conversation!

[–] Allero 15 points 1 week ago

Good luck proving you're not anything to an angry mob.

[–] Allero 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Sure, but shows of this kind commonly imply that all pedophiles are child abusers and all child abusers are pedophiles, neither of which is true - and such equations have real-world negative implications.

[–] Allero 96 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (23 children)

There's one more angle to this - apart from the raise in vigilante violence and messing up with police operations which both are very valid.

Just as we stopped getting TV feeds constantly equating pedophiles to child molesters, those guys stepped in to fill the void.

Pedophiles are not inherently child molesters. This kind of equation is not only wrong, it also adds to promoting dangerous behaviors among them.

Plenty of pedophiles will never abuse a single child, knowing full well it is dangerous and harmful for minors to be engaged in such relationships. However, the more we equate pedophiles to predators, the more people, especially in the emotionally vulnerable groups like teen pedophiles, will actually accept themselves in this role. Among those who stands against this anyway, plenty will become suicidal, not seeing an option to live a non-offending life.

Current methods of therapy aimed at reducing child abuse rates go very strongly on this - pedophiles should face message of them not being inherently dangerous, not the message of them being an immediate and imminent danger. Not only this is scientifically correct, it is actually useful in making these people safer for others.

[–] Allero 1 points 1 week ago

That would be plausible if not for "X" (as in "ex" on the pic)

[–] Allero 4 points 1 week ago

I'm feeling generous, let's remember the good times~

[–] Allero 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This pic is getting more and more trimmed every time it is posted

There you go, the full pic:

1000071936

[–] Allero 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Even better

I just came up with the absolute dumb simple solution :D

[–] Allero 1 points 1 week ago

You're gonna need a lot of very fine wire

[–] Allero 12 points 1 week ago

First I'm gonna move out of my apartment since there will sure be plenty of geniuses who's gonna produce 1 cubic meter of solid gold, and the building might not be happy about 20-ton blocks appearing out of thin air.

[–] Allero 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

breathing in

Aluminium

[–] Allero 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Rheostat, my dudes

view more: ‹ prev next ›