None of that has been mentioned by op, beyond "here is the actual definition of genocide." op pointed to the amnesty international definition, and was refused by his opponent. so defaulting to the dictionary.... Isreal is exterminating an ethnic group intentionally.... Its fkn genocide.
What are you on about? Either we go by the legal definition of genocide, which isreal clearly meets, or we go by the dictionary definition of genocide that isreal clearly meets... What point do you think you are making?
Are you saying it can't be genocide cause that must be proven in a court of law? That is asinine.
I'm not misunderstanding you, you are misunderstanding op. the official definition was rejected. I didn't come up with that dumb shit, their opponent did. I'm merely stating that denying that its genocide based on any definition available is fkn stupid, regardless of if its legalistic or layman.