BrainInABox

Why wouldn't they?

It's hard not to interpret this comment in a western chauvinistic light.

how biases are broken down by factors like factual accuracy and political alignment.

Which they determined based entirely on their own biases.

E.g. the BBC is still fairly unbiased on a lot of world news.

No? Why do you think this?

They are far less unbiased on middle eastern politics now.

Have you considered that you may have only noticed that they're aren't unbiased on the middle east.

in my experience state media tends to be less than trustworthy.

How did you determine that?

I’d say BBC is okay

You haven't been watching their year and a half of genocide support?

Private media is not any more trustworthy than state run.

Yup, more of the same rote insults. With some incoherent "no, u!" thrown in.

Edit: I highly recommend you read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

It's crazy how Wikipedia has becomes essentially the Holy Scripture of liberals.

No

Liberals really have nothing except endlessly spewing the same dozen insults at anyone who disagrees with them.

Thanks for that lazy non-sequitor

That's the opposite of an emperical basis: that's a purely vibes based statement

Different ideologies but same cheeks from the same arse as one might put it.

They might, if they were a teenager who got all of their political understanding from Marvel movies