Buelldozer

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Buelldozer 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I know for a fact that parts of it can be built now. Everyone is in these comments trying to pretend that its still 1983 (the year Reagan announced SDI) while ignoring the fact that PATRIOT, NIKE, and THAAD have existed for two decades. Never mind that DE M-SHORAD, DRAGONFIRE and some others are already in production in various countries.

This ain't 1983. Many things considered impossible 42 years ago are so routine in 2025 that we take them for granted.

[–] Buelldozer 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The math and physics problems of SDI (Reagan’s Star Wars) hasn’t changed.

42 years of engineering evolution means we can build things now that were impossible back then. The US Army's DE M-SHORAD and the British Dragonfire, two different High Energy Laser Systems that are already in production, are examples.

The US now has space based quantum sensing systems for God's sake. That shit was literally unimaginable in 1983!

"Quantum Radar" would have been straight Science Fiction back then and yet at least the US and Australia have already built test systems for it.

The Scientists and Engineers of 1983, even the ones working on SDI, would likely have told you that the SmartPhone in your pocket right now was impossible and could never be built. The screen alone would have had them cumming in their pants and the camera system and processing power in the thing would have blown their minds.

SDI was a long time ago. May as well compare a 1983 Chevy to a 2025 LUCID EV.

[–] Buelldozer 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

The "Golden Dome" system is almost certainly more bullshit from Trump not because it's infeasible but because we can't afford to build it. At least not right now.

What Trump is pitching is the same snake oil Reaganite “Star Wars” program that was scrapped 30 years ago.

SDI never really ended and research on the core technologies continue to this day. Things like Patriot and NIKE came out of the program some 20 years ago and we're now starting to get the energy weapon systems that Reagan envisioned.

The Israeli Iron Dome can’t beat Yemeni intercontinental bottle rockets, nevermind Iranian SCUD missiles.

Iron Dome does an amazingly good job at defending from the threats it was designed to handle. It wasn't meant to deal with MRBM or ICBM threats.

These programs don’t meaningfully protect a country that is under bombardment.

Effective defense from MRBM and ICBM attack has been technically possible for nearly two decades however installing a GBMD system of that size would bankrupt the United States several times over. The missiles it uses are a hundred million a piece if IIRC and we'd need tens of thousands of them.

What's changed is that Ground Based Directed Energy Weapons of sufficient power, a direct result of SDI, to interdict ICBMS will be available in the near future. The US Military is already fielding lower power systems like the DE M-SHORAD and everyone from Lockheed to Raytheon has 1MW (or higher) GBDEW systems starting testing this year.

Hell the British already have their Dragonfire system, rated at 300KW, not only built but scheduled to be put on Navy Vessels in 2027 and the US Navy has had a system like this for nearly a decade already.

The fantasy of missile defense only escalates these conflicts.

Missile defense isn't a fantasy, the short range version has been around for a long while now. Medium and Long Range has been possible for two decades it's just been wildly unaffordable at scale. That is about to change.

[–] Buelldozer 2 points 6 days ago

On my Android devices right below "New Tab" is an option for "Bookmarks". I guess YMMV depending on what your mobile device is?

[–] Buelldozer 5 points 6 days ago

Always amazes me how few people seem to know about DACs. I use them extensively in racks. They're inexpensive and easy to use.

[–] Buelldozer 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Old meme is old. I'm in Central Wyoming with reasonably priced 2Gb/s FTTH and I could order 10Gb/s if I wanted it.

[–] Buelldozer 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Uhhhh, mine does. Why doesn't yours?

[–] Buelldozer 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, still true.

[–] Buelldozer 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Despite your wall of text this isn't just a problem in the United States.

[–] Buelldozer 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I started with Slackware. It came on floppies.

Now move to the back of the line youngster.

[–] Buelldozer 1 points 1 week ago

So I read the whole article and the acquittal happened because German Police did not translate the section informing the person what they were being accused of. That's no small thing.

Then there's the fact that the German Police kept turning off the recording during the interrogation, there's no mention of "homicide" on the recordings, and you can't hear the accused voice on the recordings!

So basically there's no proof that the accused knew what he was charged with nor is there any direct recordings of his confession.

The only thing this shit proves is that German Cops are as bad at their fucking jobs as American Cops.

[–] Buelldozer 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you know they are there then manage the network and environment to limit the risk.

What's being discussed here are undocumented network connections that were wired to the primary controls through a secondary data bus so that standard monitoring tools wouldn't see the traffic.

Even if it isn't malicious it's terrible, no-good, shitty design work.

https://cybersecuritynews.com/u-s-officials-investigating-rogue-communication-devices/

 

I ordered some sidewalk heating mats from HeatTrak and I want to automate them with HA so that they come on when it makes sense to do so based on the data from my Tempest Weather Station.

According to HeatTrack my mats will have a combined resistive load of 5A which is well within the spec of the Zooz ZEN05 or ZEN14, both rated for 15A resistive loads, but when I asked them about it they did not recommend using either of them with heated mats. They couldn't, or wouldn't, explain why and it doesn't make sense to me why this wouldn't work.

My next thought was to simply swap the outlet to something smart but this is an outdoor outlet so it needs to be GFCI and there's essentially no Z-Wave GFCI outlets made.

Do I really need to use something like an Enbrighten Z-Wave Plus 40-Amp contactor for this or am I missing something here?

 

I have an automation that turns my driveway lights on when motion is detected. It normally works fairly well but it was windy last night and that caused the automation to trip endlessly as my trees and bushes were whipping around. Lights would come on, shut off 10 minutes later, then turn right back on again. It basically did this all night until I disabled the automation.

I'll do some fine tuning of the motion sensors which will help and I'm considering adding a condition to the automation where it won't trip if the wind speed is above a certain level but how can I add some kind of cool down timer to the automation to prevent it from endlessly engaging?

 

First the layout. My garage is setup similar to this one, although mine is attached, has three light fixtures, and my driveway is 4 cars wide.

The wife wants me to replace the three basic on / off fixtures that we have (they're getting rusty) and keep them all matching. If I'm going to do this I want to add a camera to the setup.

Functionally I'd like the lights to have or work like they have dual bright capability where they come on full bright at sunset then after a couple of hours they dim down unless they detect motion. If they detect motion then they come back to full bright for a period of time then dim back down again. They do this for a set period of hours, say 4, then they turn off completely unless they detect motion.

My current lights are already automated for on / off (but not dimming or motion) through the use of HA and a z-wave switch.

Where I'm getting stuck is that I can see at least three ways to do this but none of them are perfect.

  1. Replace my dumb carriage fixtures with new dumb fixtures then change the switch to a dimming version plus add a motion sensor and camera out front. Then setup HA for the functionality I want. The upside of doing it this way is that it's very easy to get matching fixtures. The downside is that the motion sensor and camera will not be well integrated visually.

  2. Replace my dumb fixtures with ones that have dual bright built in. It's easy to do, and I could even keep the HA Automation I have setup now, but again the camera setup is not going to integrate well visually. I'm also concerned that three motion sensors controlling three lights will cause trouble for the camera (or each other) because they will react to different things and turn themselves on and off independently.

  3. Replace my dumb fixtures with smarter ones. In the center position I'd use one that has an integrated motion sensor and camera. This Reolink seems like it would work pretty well. However RL doesn't make any fixtures that match it, which means my center fixture would look different than the other two.

I may just have to deal with mismatched fixtures but does anyone have any suggestions? Am I missing an option?

 

The U.S. House of Representatives has one voting member for every 747,000 or so Americans. That’s by far the highest population-to-representative ratio among a peer group of industrialized democracies, and the highest it’s been in U.S. history.

3
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Buelldozer to c/uncapthehouse
 

Radically expanding the House of Representatives would help solve some of the biggest problems facing Congress and, by extension, the country.

 

The next step in my HA journey is adding cameras; indoor, outdoor, and doorbell so I've been exploring my options. I had originally intended to do a Frigate setup, I even have a Coral module and PC to do it with, but then I discovered Reolink.

Without having any experience with them they look nearly ideal. They seem to have tight integration with HA 2023.3 or later and their pricing and functionality look good.

They seem like a no brainer but I've noticed that they're often NOT the first recommendation in the HA Community. Why is that and why shouldn't I use them?

 

UDMP is running UniFi OS 3.1.16 and I need a specific VPN configuration that StrongSwan supports but isn't possible to do in the GUI. Three years ago the files I need were located in /run/strongswan/ipsec.d/tunnels/ but they are no longer there. Does anyone know where they live now -or- how to edit a VPN config outside of the GUI?

 

The state’s top energy office has recommended two energy projects for a combined $19 million in support from a Wyoming taxpayer-funded program established to provide matching dollars for federal energy and carbon capture grants.

Some $9.1 million would go to the Sweetwater Carbon Storage Hub in southwest Wyoming, and $10 million would support a “nuclear microreactor” effort to assess the manufacture and deployment of small-scale nuclear reactors in the state and beyond, according to the Wyoming Energy Authority, which manages the Energy Matching Funds program on behalf of the governor.

The awards, pending Gov. Mark Gordon’s final approval, would be the first appropriations from the state program. The Legislature created the fund last year with a $100 million allotment and added another $50 million to it earlier this year. The idea is to give Wyoming-based clean- and low-carbon energy projects a competitive edge by providing matching funds needed to land federal dollars available via the Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act.

view more: ‹ prev next ›