CasualPenguin

joined 1 year ago
[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 37 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I think they included Scrubs "9th season" which was actually a prank that didn't happen, the real finale looks pretty highly rated

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 9 points 2 months ago

I have some water in my bath tub but that doesn't make it equivalent to an ocean.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why but I want to say persimmon. They're worth getting tossed out of paradise for atnleast

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When he was tweeting for his followers to amass and how it was going to get "wild" (from memory I think that's what he said) on January 6th long in advance I was freaked out but everyone said that was not a big deal.

I still doubt anyone will see this as a big deal the second time :/

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

"the same way I'm against carbs" is instantly now going to be one of my commonly used phrases.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago

If it's concrete evidence then that makes the size of the stones less impressive because they could just add water and make them on site.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago

I'll add another:

He does it, not pretends someone else is requiring he do it

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Forget legal recourse (assuming this post is true at face value which is a huge assumption I know) but if a corporation is trying to get out of ending a human life in such an obviously unjust way, we as a society should be burning them to the ground.

But at the same time, who would throw away their life (being jailed) in order to do that, because citizens are definitely not protected in the same way, so this will just keep on happening. (Assuming this case is real, but there are other equally abhorrent examples of corporations being excused of consequences for ending human life for the sake of making money)

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 30 points 3 months ago

Yeah but they get away with it because their audience only cares/is fed the stuff they agree with

Trump said the government should be allowed to take people's guns without due process (just breaking two constitutional amendments, NBD) and Republicans just had to wait a couple days and their voters forgot about it

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

So many dancing Spidermans

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com -1 points 3 months ago

I'm still waiting to see civilization start...

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good point, but also it's not that they will lose all of the user data they sell if people switch off Chrome, just the parts that chrome collects.

If they were blocking ublock users from accessing any google products then it would be purely a 'we only care about ad revenue'

It would be very interesting to see the internal data they use to make these decisions, but also knowing tech these decisions were probably made by a series of mid level managers sufficiently sucking the air out of the room until a critical mass was hit to make this happen

view more: ‹ prev next ›