Chucklestheclown

It isn't illegal. Congress delegated tariffs to the president many years ago. To me this should be a job of Congress and Congress shouldn't be able to delegate its duties, but it isn't illegal

Elmo isn't the same guy who just wanted to be tickled before

Oh no! Less than 1/2 of 1%. The world is ending.

So now you are against taxes? I am confused, were you against tariffs when the other president did them? Or just Trump?

It cost 25 dollars to get an mri. What a hospital charges isn’t what you pay. You pay what the final bill states.

That is false. So easy to prove you wrong and maybe educate you a bit on the topic of taxes

https://manhattan.institute/article/correcting-the-top-10-tax-myths

In reality, these European tax systems do not fit the American progressive image because their higher revenues are overwhelmingly raised through steep income, payroll, and consumption taxes on the middle class.

Moreover, top rates imposed on corporations and wealthy families in the U.S. often exceed OECD averages

I haven’t hear many people say Jan 6th was acceptable. It was a riot and should be treated as a riot.

Fighting ice. That’s an insurrection and should be treated as such

We don't know if inflation will increase or not. It isn't guaranteed to raise inflation. The last time it didn't raise inflation. This time they do not appear to be driving inflation either.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/inflation-trump-tariffs/

I don't care what every other country does. That is a weird response. Other countries tax their rich less and their middle class more. Would you be happy if we did that? If not, then stop talking about different countries.

Nobody rioted before Jan 6th?

You think it's disorganized, but it is part of his plan. We saw this last time he was in office.

Studies have shown his tariffs did not increase inflation. So why bring up misinformation?

I am not wrong. I am right. It is costing too much money and we cannot afford it. It is bad spending.

He wasn’t though. Look at last time he was busted.

Sure make a company that successfully done it. Nobody has pulled that off yet.

In its current state it helps worker be more efficient but it’s often wrong. I’ve yet to see anyone replaced by it or head counts reduced. Right now it’s helping less talented people become more talented. Eventually that may change but for many jobs, laws prevent AI from replacing people. It can assist but cannot replace. My kid does insurance claims. They decided to have AI do some of the works. Turns out by law a person has to do the work. The fines were severe. Also it was wrong most of the time.

One day they’ll get there but it’s not impacting jobs from what I’ve seen and it’s what I sell for a Fortune 500 company. We don’t even hint it would replace people as they just isn’t what it does right now. We say it enhances people.