CleverOleg

joined 1 year ago
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 27 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

In honor of today’s doomer discourse, I present you all with this absolute gem of a comment from comrade @DiscoPosting@hexbear.net in one of the news megas in the days after Oct 7.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 10 points 6 hours ago

I am a bloomer, and I would like to think that I have very good, grounded reasons for my bloomerism. But I do worry that being a bloomer leaves me with blind spots in my analysis.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

I have a "friend" from childhood. While his political and religious ideologies are 100% in opposition to mine (and yours), I've decided for now to keep this person as a friend (though at a distance) because a.) like most other Americans, he is ultimately an apolitical person, and b.) ever since we were kids and to today, 99.9% of what we talk about is shallow stuff about sports, movies, board games, TV shows, etc. News and politics never comes up.

He has never brought up Israel / Gaza until this morning. He listens to Ben Shapiro so I assume he has the worst, ill-informed takes, but I don't know because we've literally never talked about it. He says "Did you hear about these exploding pagers and walkie talkies in Lebanon?"

My intentionally boring but uninteresting response, in the interests of maintaining a friendship for now, was "I really hope this doesn't lead to a broader war".

I feel like that was an honest-enough answer. It doesn't seem like he wants to pursue it any further. I do feel conflicted about how to respond, I'm generally of the opinion that you're just wasting energy on American chuds who will almost certainly never come around. But I don't know, I'm open to criticism on how I'm handling this situation.

Edit: well apparently he doesn’t want to leave it there, called Hezbollah “terrorists”. Here’s to the probable end of a 25 year friendship today.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think if Trotsky became head of the USSR, there probably would have been counter-revolution and full capitalist restoration one way or another within a decade or two.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago

I noticed a day or two after she was murdered, the media flipped from calling her an “American” to a “Turkish-Amercian”. The hyphenated descriptor allows you be assured she wasn’t a “real” American.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago (6 children)

And is it just me who thinks it’s completely insane to see left wing publications regurgitating neoclassical myths like using monetary policy to control inflation

While this isn’t an excuse, I think even on the left it’s hard to escape the underlying economic assumptions of society. While we should insist that leftists and leftists publications educate themselves and be better informed how the economy works… it’s not as simple as reading up on the first volume of Capital or even the third volume. Understanding the nuts and bolts of modern capitalism is hard. Of course it’s imperative the Marxists most of all understand it (again, not making excuses), but I think there’s just a dearth of resources out there to improve here.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah if there’s one thing Americans are demanding this election, it’s to spend tens of billions more on the war in Ukraine.

Also when did the US ever actually “stand up” to our boy Papa Joe? Honestly the US never was able to do shit to Lenin, Stalin, or even Khrushchev frankly (the US did kinda back down in the Cuban middle crisis)?

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

I’m not sure, it’s fairly common knowledge nowadays (my teacher in HS covered it). Real estate speculation in lands not yet fully ethnically cleansed was a massive source of wealth for many of the founding fathers.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

Yakovlev taking over the glasnost media and immediately putting anti-communists in every position of power is a big reason why we don’t have the USSR anymore, IMO. Just to further your point about Zdhanov.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 27 points 6 days ago

We’re also seeing that either the Chinese government has less control over its own banks than we previously thought, or they believe that the economic benefits of trading with Western countries still far outweigh a closer relationship with Russia (a very tiny economy compared to the collective West), indicative of their inability to wean off an export-oriented economy.

My hunch is that it’s the later. It tracks with all the other moves China has made in recent years, where trade with the west is prized over potentially harming that trade with “hostile” moves like de-dollarization.

105
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by CleverOleg@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 

The Popular Front that just got elected isn’t quite Neo-Trotskyite, but still.

Tbh the direction that we seem to be headed w/r/t homelessness in the US actually seems worse than the sanctuaries in 2024 Stark Trek San Francisco.

 

Belen Fernandez consistently has very good anti-imperialist takes.

 

I found this to be a good, short primer on the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. It goes into detail on how the Soviets tried to pursue collective security with the British and French, only to have them both drag their heels until it was clear to the Soviets that they had no interest in actually agreeing to collective security. Even after the Soviets telegraphed that they would instead work with the Germans if the British and French didn’t get serious, they still wouldn’t.

view more: next ›