CommieGabredabok

joined 2 years ago
[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah that's really the crux of controversy surrounding that topic. I briefly discussed tariffs, social democracy, and concession to western workers funded via super exploitation in LRC (Leftist Reading Club). In the chart i didn't put much emphasis on tariffs and its contribution to upholding the imperialist state and social democracy. Again, the chart is just representation but i did include tariffs in constant capital of the 2nd section. I didn't think it would make sense to put cost of tariffs by the surplus value transferred section, because i viewed the tariffs as not directly stemming from surplus value extraction, but as an additional constant cost (which all costs and expenses of a business would be covered by total revenue, whether a portion of the revenue from a sale stems from surplus value, or constant capital is irrelevant because its the aggregate value; the real essence of tariffs relates to the overall exchange value and relation to a commodity, not the relation of the cost of tariffs itself).

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Also note this shows only two parts of the global commodity chain. This shows the unequal exchange and markup of commodities which the first example in the book was garments: T-Shirts specifically. The garment industry also happens to be particularly labour intensive. The prices are marked up from (in the example given) T-shirts sold at 1.35 Euro to 5.00 Euro. It doesn't show further markups (which also contribute to inflated perceptions of GDP) of retailers to (in this example) 35.00 Euro.

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

STOP ONLY JUST UPVOTING THIS doggirl-tears I NEED DISCOURSE, IDEAS, AND THOUGHTS NOT FRICKING FAKE INTERNET POINTS

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also additional question: Is constant capital attributed to GDP? I would assume when analyzing a commodity's exchange value it doesn't but when we look at the actual commodities, raw materials, etc that make up constant capital it would already have been factored into GDP. Therefor there would be no need to factor in constant capital again

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/4453394

My leftist reading group at uni is reading Imperialism in the 21st Century by John Smith. Is my diagram that i quickly drew up a good supplement for it? Also I know in other spaces shit flinging occurs about value created through labor in the west being "more productive," so more value is created than "unproductive third world labor" vs the inverse of that position; the length of the values in the diagram is arbitrary and constrained for space reasons, not because i think one way or another; but feel free to argue ig. I mean, has anyone read the polemics of Harvey and Smith? They are sassy as fuck and hilarious. Disappointing though to see Harvey to take such a vague and stance on modern imperialism, as well as the dissavowment of China by Smith because of alleged "Stalinism" (lol). I'll link the first video and four polemics they directed at eachother: "Imperialism: Is it still a relevant concept?"-Harvey "A critique of David Harveys analysis of imperialism"-Smith "David Harvey denies imperialism"-Smith "Realities on the Ground: David Harvey replies to John Smith"-Harvey "Imperialist Realities vs. the Myths of David Harvey"- Smith

Also in the leftist reading club we're using these as additional sources:

https://monthlyreview.org/2019/03/01/global-commodity-chains-and-the-new-imperialism/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49687-y https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X?via=ihub

Secondly, and more broadly, is the view of stock market bubbles forming due to speculation and the discontinuity between stock price and actual value an accurate assessment? Because of massive price gauging and speculation for textiles, garments, tech, housing, coffee, etc it seems to me like a large portion of many western economies or at least the US economy is sitting on a large bubble across almost all industries, and i've heard talks of an oncoming economic disaster from people of all flavors. Could mass tariffs and import restrictions on the global commodity chain bring about the popping of these bubbles?

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/4453394

My leftist reading group at uni is reading Imperialism in the 21st Century by John Smith. Is my diagram that i quickly drew up a good supplement for it? Also I know in other spaces shit flinging occurs about value created through labor in the west being "more productive," so more value is created than "unproductive third world labor" vs the inverse of that position; the length of the values in the diagram is arbitrary and constrained for space reasons, not because i think one way or another; but feel free to argue ig. I mean, has anyone read the polemics of Harvey and Smith? They are sassy as fuck and hilarious. Disappointing though to see Harvey to take such a vague and stance on modern imperialism, as well as the dissavowment of China by Smith because of alleged "Stalinism" (lol). I'll link the first video and four polemics they directed at eachother: "Imperialism: Is it still a relevant concept?"-Harvey "A critique of David Harveys analysis of imperialism"-Smith "David Harvey denies imperialism"-Smith "Realities on the Ground: David Harvey replies to John Smith"-Harvey "Imperialist Realities vs. the Myths of David Harvey"- Smith

Also in the leftist reading club we're using these as additional sources:

https://monthlyreview.org/2019/03/01/global-commodity-chains-and-the-new-imperialism/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49687-y https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X?via=ihub

Secondly, and more broadly, is the view of stock market bubbles forming due to speculation and the discontinuity between stock price and actual value an accurate assessment? Because of massive price gauging and speculation for textiles, garments, tech, housing, coffee, etc it seems to me like a large portion of many western economies or at least the US economy is sitting on a large bubble across almost all industries, and i've heard talks of an oncoming economic disaster from people of all flavors. Could mass tariffs and import restrictions on the global commodity chain bring about the popping of these bubbles?

 

My leftist reading group at uni is reading Imperialism in the 21st Century by John Smith. Is my diagram that i quickly drew up a good supplement for it? Also I know in other spaces shit flinging occurs about value created through labor in the west being "more productive," so more value is created than "unproductive third world labor" vs the inverse of that position; the length of the values in the diagram is arbitrary and constrained for space reasons, not because i think one way or another; but feel free to argue ig. I mean, has anyone read the polemics of Harvey and Smith? They are sassy as fuck and hilarious. Disappointing though to see Harvey to take such a vague and stance on modern imperialism, as well as the dissavowment of China by Smith because of alleged "Stalinism" (lol). I'll link the first video and four polemics they directed at eachother: "Imperialism: Is it still a relevant concept?"-Harvey "A critique of David Harveys analysis of imperialism"-Smith "David Harvey denies imperialism"-Smith "Realities on the Ground: David Harvey replies to John Smith"-Harvey "Imperialist Realities vs. the Myths of David Harvey"- Smith

Also in the leftist reading club we're using these as additional sources:

https://monthlyreview.org/2019/03/01/global-commodity-chains-and-the-new-imperialism/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49687-y https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X?via=ihub

Secondly, and more broadly, is the view of stock market bubbles forming due to speculation and the discontinuity between stock price and actual value an accurate assessment? Because of massive price gauging and speculation for textiles, garments, tech, housing, coffee, etc it seems to me like a large portion of many western economies or at least the US economy is sitting on a large bubble across almost all industries, and i've heard talks of an oncoming economic disaster from people of all flavors. Could mass tariffs and import restrictions on the global commodity chain bring about the popping of these bubbles?

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

4 years old. so probably pre-Kindegarten

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

oooh, wowie! Thank you so much!!! I definitely wanna start as soon as possibly I can :3

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ummmm. It was my birthday recently and now I have decide I should start HRT. How do I start? What do I need? And where do I get the stuff from? I'm still totally cis though, I just really, really want feminizing hormones... crush

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yesterday I had a discussion with some oncoming PSL members about the history of class struggle within the United States. It's apparently a lot more extensive than I originally thought, given the settler colonial origins...

I might return to continue this comment, but I am in the middle of Calculus class lol

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also here is some more context on one telegram experience in particular. Why are telegram channels like this??

: (CW: bigotry)

spoiler

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's fucking with my head. Before I started questioning my gender, I found all the progressive spaces that were for queer liberation.

Now that I've started to question gender, I've been stumbling across all sorts of queerphobic "communist" spaces: from irl parties, to telegram, discord, and "friends." It really pisses me off, and I get interrogated about "being a liberal."

on a side note: does anybody have any info on how to figure out if your trans or an egg or cis or anything?

 

I'm not even from ~~Britain~~ the Great Atlantic Garbage Patch, but this appeared in my recommended and it pisses me off.

"Deeper study has now convinced me [...] the English Working class will never achieve anything [etc]"

"Participation in the domination of the world market was and is the basis of the political nullity of the English workers" ukkk ukkk ukkk

[–] CommieGabredabok@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I view him favorably. I wouldn't say he's a patsoc, but he absolutely radiates edgy schizophrenic conspiracy vibes, which I love. I really enjoy seeing the conspiracy-to-communist pipeline and just wild shit like that in general. Even if I don't believe in some of the stuff myself, it's really fun

view more: next ›