Yeah, still doesn't belong here though.
Derproid
joined 1 year ago
Shit that is a good point.
Oh shit, I've owned them for less than a year now so haven't seen that yet. Thanks for the heads up will check them out.
I don't think people accept it happening in a male character, in both cases it makes for a bad movie. The term woke is just so politically charged it doesn't really apply to when it is a male character.
Why is it woke when female or “minority” characters are this way but not when white male characters are this way?
Not OP but both are bad movies for the same reason, the term woke just only applies to those that seem to have been made this way to promote some idea that minority women are amazing and white men suck. That's just how the term woke evolved since it's a politically charged term.
And how is Galadriel not the way she is described in the original IP?
I don't know much about this but is this the dwarf queen who was supposed to have a beard but didn't? If so then yeah definitely not as described in the original IP. If not, well yeah no idea then.
Fucking calvin klein microfiber boxers made me a changed man. Expensive shit though.
... I mean ... idk ... If the argument is that the drawn version doesn't harm kids and gives pedos an outlet, is a ai generated version any different?
4chan has trans furry Nazis, arguably the most diverse group in existence.
Isn't this just a good indicator that there might not be a need to defederate? If they aren't causing problems for your users than it doesn't seem right to defed preemptively.
Yes, my point is that they aren't the same bottle.
The thought process assumes it is a complete and perfect cloning of all aspects we do and don't understand. The reason the clone is not you is because if I do something to the clone it does not affect you.
Like if you take a water bottle and clone it, drinking one does not cause the other to be empty. Thus they must be two separate things.
"Google invents a new standard" is very different from "Google CEO does a big dumb dumb"