Dipbeneaththelasers

joined 8 months ago
[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 3 points 5 months ago

I use one too because I'm not away; I'm right fucking here in the office doing all this in-person collaborating management wants so badly.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 87 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Often scammers don't want to make it less obvious. If it's obvious and the mark falls for it, it's a good indicator they're on the hook and will fall for more. It's to filter out the less gullible so the scammer doesn't waste their time. Probably not the case with this situation specifically, but it holds true in general with scams.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Congrats on your trauma I guess.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 12 points 6 months ago

Instrike birdmance

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Bad title, if the article is accurate. What's happening is they are trying to repeal an exemption made in 2020 to existing anti-mask laws that were instituted to curtail secret societies and the KKK.

It does not appear that masking for health reasons was prosecuted before the exemption was made for covid. Would it be prosecuted now though is the question.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 50 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Generally? Yes. Specifically? No.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers 7 points 6 months ago

Oh they very specifically are.

view more: ‹ prev next ›