Dkcecil91

joined 2 years ago
[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Double response to the same post. Unnecessary.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I agree. This guy's been all over this thread and all he's really said is "wouldn't it be better if nobody died?" Yeah of course it would. No one can argue with that and no one should argue with the poster above you because it isn't productive at all.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lol, gl with that. In the meantime other people are still allowed to set more reasonable and feasible goalposts.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's really hard to tell what's sarcasm in this comment and what, if anything, isn't.

Edit: never mind, reread it and realized you're just a crazy person.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not all that strange, just go by a planned parenthood and check out the crazies accosting people outside of those.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man you must really hate jokes.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Who let the boomers in here? Why are we talking about communists?

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The fact that charity is needed is inherently bad.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope you one day get to live "wontonly" as you'd like to. Then maybe you too can die in the street, addicted to drugs. Either way, maybe you'll spell wantonly right the next time you try to use a semi-large word while trying to sound like a blowhard intellectual.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Dude, the US was grown out of the blood of the people who were already living in whatever place they wanted to be at the time. Every president has done something horrible to people who were just trying to live their lives. Kennedy did an exceptional amount for the average worker despite that and if other presidents had followed in his footsteps, we would probably have a more egalitarian society today. Being a hard edged absolutist and unable to see in shades of gray and take into account the prejudices and circumstamces of the time period does not make you correct. Especially as all of your posts (apart from quickly googling a definition) have been very low effort and provided no candidate for who you would say is better, even though the other poster asked you for one several posts ago. Try being constructive instead of destructive, if you even know how.

[–] Dkcecil91@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say it's necessarily that too many people shouldn't have a voice. Just that too many of the people who shouldn't have much of a voice or any at all are the ones who really want to have one, often times.

view more: ‹ prev next ›