411

‘No Republican party’ in US today, says anti-Trump conservative judge (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 184 points 10 months ago

“American democracy simply cannot function without two equally healthy and equally strong political parties,” J Michael Luttig told CNN on Wednesday. “So today, in my view, there is no Republican party to counter the Democratic party in the country.

“And for that reason, American democracy is in grave peril.”

For that reason?

That's the reason?

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 80 points 10 months ago

I think the real reason is that the people in power keep touting this idea of only two distinct parties. Having only two parties means you have only two directions to go. Which is destined for extremism.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 46 points 10 months ago

The FPTP voting system reinforces that. Any third party is just going to be a spoiler for one of the majors without voting system reform.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is the correct answer. Third parties are rarely viable in first-past-the-post systems. More info on Duverger's Law here.

If we had more viable parties it would be much harder to do regulatory capture and corrupt every party, and even if that happened new viable ones could spring up at any time. We might actually get candidates that represent diverse political opinions. With more parties one party would be unlikely to have a majority or supermajority, and our representatives would have to work together and form coalitions to get anything done. Politics wouldn't be a team sport about defeating the other side, it would be about shared goals and constructive legislation. Candidates would want to appeal to voters who they might be the second or third choice for, meaning scapegoating, vilifying and othering segments of society would be a losing strategy. Ranked choice voting has few downsides for anyone but those who want a corrupt system they can capture and a society they can divide.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Go back a few years. Circa 1960, the two parties had both Liberal and Conservative wings. There was no shame in a pol voting with the other party.

[-] PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You need a multi party system like a lot of countries round the world. No clear winner = who can quickly form the larges coalition. It usually boils down to two main parties with a lot of also-ran's.

Over here we even have The Monster Raving Loony pary!

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Fisk400@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Both the democratic and republican party are several smaller parties tied together into two disgusting rat king. If one of them disappear today there will be an instant split of the surviving party into two new rat kings. The collapse isn't what they fear. They fear that the Overton window would move left.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

And even a big move to the left would still leave us leaning right.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it’s very clear that the republicans in government are moving far right, but the electorate in general is steadily moving left.

Every year, about 4 million Americans turn 18 and gain the right to vote. In the eight years between the 2016 and 2024 elections, that’s 32 million new eligible voters.

Also every year, 2½ million older Americans die. So in the same eight years, that’s as many as 20 million fewer older voters.

Which means that between Trump’s election in 2016 and the 2024 election, the number of Gen Z (born in the late 1990s and early 2010s) voters will have advanced by a net 52 million against older people. That’s about 20 percent of the total 2020 eligible electorate of 258 million Americans.

And unlike previous generations, Gen Z votes. Comparing the four federal elections since 2015 (when the first members of Gen Z turned 18) with the preceding nine (1998 to 2014), average turnout by young voters (defined here as voters under 30) in the Trump and post-Trump years has been 25 percent higher than that of older generations at the same age before Trump — 8 percent higher in presidential years and a whopping 46 percent higher in midterms.

https://archive.ph/3Ydkn

And according to voter data. Gen z is very progressive especially on policy:

https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/The-Exit-Polls.pdf?x91208

In 15-20 years nearly half of all boomers will be dead. The current gop can’t win a single national popular vote. Without half these boomers, they will collapse or move left. And the Overton window will shift considerably left. And with Europe moving right in a lot of counties, I’d say it wouldn’t be surprising to see the US as left as Europe in a shot time.

Also: Europe is not as left leaning as people tend to think. Aside from trains and healthcare they’re not all the left wing. And it is moving right. I’m an Italian citizen and I see it happening in Italy, and many other counties.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] 520@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

He's got a point. The Republican party is fundamentally not healthy at all.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, but the framing of it reads like the Democratic party being too powerful is the worst possible outcome, rather than the Republican party destroying society.

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Ding ding ding

It's honestly impressive how accurate and succinct that part of his analysis is. I actually do agree that the long-term viability of the establishment GOP could be in serious trouble, and that the outcome a few years hence, of the Democrats as the only viable political party in Washington, would be a big problem for several different reasons. And, I think this is literally the first time I've heard that fairly serious topic being raised anywhere in the media.

But, our democracy is facing another slightly more pressing and short-term problem at the moment...

[-] OldFartPhil@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Nonsense. It's very unlikely that a party with members as diverse politically as Joe Manchin and AOC would form a monolithic power block in the absence of the GOP. It's far more likely that the Democratic party would fragment.

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

They could. Actually having the party fragment would be among the best options; the AOC wing is pretty tiny right now, and either switching to a non-ridiculous non-FPTP voting system, or fragmenting the party, would position it to actually be able to gain some traction.

One worse way it could shake out is the Democratic primaries become the main event (loosely divided between a progressive wing and an establishment wing). A lot of the establishment people who run the system would actually like that better, because the primaries don't have to operate as democratically as the general elections, and a lot of people would still "have to" vote for the Democrats, so in practice it would be a small minority progressive wing within a largely-establishment party. Pretty similar to now except with more corruption. Like I say, I think there are a lot of problems with that outcome.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

For now. What will the Democratic party look like in ten years without a decent opposition party?

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

party systems come and go. ours is almost over, and the republican party's death will be the cause

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 113 points 10 months ago

Bullshit. Institutionalized racism, misogyny, homophobia, and white Christian separatism as party platform. No matter how "conservative" Republicans claimed to be, The Southern Strategy was the core value and singular driving force for the past 60 years. MAGA isn't a symptom, it's result

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

"MAGA" is literally the abbreviation of a Reagan campaign slogan.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Yup, he isn't original he's just a immoral guy who wants Daddy to be proud, ironically he wouldn't be done he worked very hard to remove the stain of pimping and racism from their fortune only to have dumb dumb here make the trump name an international joke.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 85 points 10 months ago

Nah motherfucker, all republicans own this shit. Suck it up, traitors. Worthless fucking filth.

[-] weinermeat@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I like you

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago

As an old guy, I'd have to agree, though as a leftist turned anarchist, I don't give much of a fuck.

I think back though on the Republicans of my youth, and it really was a notably different party.

It's sort of weird to phrase it like this, but they were assholes with principles. I mean - they were shallow, bigoted assholes then too, but it was more common then for them to still be like the old '50s All-American cliche - patriotic, proud, moral, hard-working, honest... conservative in the old sense of the word. I didn't agree with them at all but at least they had a relatively coherent, if shallow and ignorant, ideology that they generally actually lived by.

Somehow though, especially over the last 20 years or so, they've morphed into this bizarre and startlingly toxic mix of psychopaths, hypocrites and grifters. They have no principles at all really - just things and people that they hate - and it's not even vaguely about trying to accomplish things that they sincerely (if mistakenly) think will make the world a better place, but just about fucking over everyone else. And even themselves, if they can colorably believe that by doing so they'll manage to fuck someone else over even more.

I sincerely believe it's a sort of collective mental illness, and truth be told, I think it can only lead to the collapse of western civilization, and the US in particular. There's nothing really that can stop it. It's effectively a closed loop in which greedy psychopaths fuck things up for their own profit and privilege, ignorant psychopaths look for someone to blame for the fact that things are fucked up, power-hungry psychopaths point them at some vulnerable fringe group and tell them that it's all their fault, then while everyone's distracted, the greedy psychopaths fuck things up even more. And 'round and 'round it goes, like a turd circling a toilet bowl. And there's only one way that can end.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's nothing really that can stop it.

Things that can stop it:

The passage of time, Republicans skew older*
The death of religion, the irreligious are unlikely to vote Republican* and Americans are moving away from religion
Education, those with degrees tend to vote Democratic*
Election reform that doesn't give outsized power to rural states
Legal consequences for lying to the public in the guise of news
Ranked choice voting that allows for viable political competition from other parties both on the right and left

*https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/demographic-profiles-of-republican-and-democratic-voters/

What does the opposite of stopping it:

Fatalism that makes the good people who outnumber the bad not show up to vote

[-] Hector_McG@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fatalism that makes the good people who outnumber the bad not show up to vote

It’s the same as the “all politicians are the same” moan.

No, they’re not. It’s the crooked ones that want you to believe that they’re all the same, because that’s what keeps the crooked ones from being voted out.

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I certainly hope that the fact that the current president isn't acting simultanously like a toddler and a cult leader, but acting with decorum and attempting to negotiate with the other party to get what he wants instead of berating, yelling, and and inciting mobs on social media, hopefully that convinced enough people to think "oh shit maybe I should actually pay atrention to politics - wouldn't want that shit happening again

[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

It should be noted that the last three of those things require the exercise of authority to enact, and that authority is vested in people and institutions that flatly will not exercise it in pursuit of things that will in any way undermine their privilege or that of their wealthy cronies and patrons, and all of those things would do just that.

This is where it becomes relevant that the Democrats are only relatively less corrupt than the Republicans. They feed at the same corporate trough as the Republicans - they just have to, and do, play a somewhat different game to stay in office and maintain their privilege.

The Democrats have already demonstrated that when they have uncontested power - the presidency and congressional majorities - they will still find a way to fail to actually deliver. That's not just supposition - it's established fact. It's what they've already done. There's certainly no reason to believe that they're going to do any differently in the future.

Now that's not to say or imply that I disagree with you fundamentally. The first half of your list would at least slow the decline and putting Democrats in office would be broadly better than putting Republicans in office.

But the Democrat establishment, and the DNC in particular, is too corrupt and too compromised to provide more than token opposition to the oligarchy.

Elsewhere in this thread, a poster wrote of the possibility of the Republicans self-destructing snd the Democrats fragmenting. I don't think that's particularly likely, but it is attractive, since it would serve not only to eliminate the most overtly corrupt and destructive party but to provide a rallying point for those who call for genuine reform - the handful of actually decent politicians of the AOC/Sanders type could potentially have some real influence instead of just being lone voices made ineffectual by their subservience to a well-established and thoroughly corrupt party hierarchy.

Again though, I don't think it's at all likely.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I’m an old guy who also turned anarchist. I unfortunately agree with you. But I’m gonna fight the fascism as long as I can. These kids deserve better.

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Well… maybe so. This may be the year when we finally come face to face with ourselves; finally just lay back and say it—that we are really just a nation of 220 million used car salesmen with all the money we need to buy guns, and no qualms at all about killing anybody else in the world who tries to make us uncomfortable. The tragedy of all this is that George McGovern, for all his mistakes and all his imprecise talk about “new politics” and “honesty in government,” is one of the few men who’ve run for President of the United States in this century who really understands what a fantastic monument to all the best instincts of the human race this country might have been, if we could have kept it out of the hands of greedy little hustlers like Richard Nixon. McGovern made some stupid mistakes, but in context they seem almost frivolous compared to the things Richard Nixon does every day of his life, on purpose, as a matter of policy and a perfect expression of everything he stands for. Jesus! Where will it end?

-Hunter Thompson, "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72"

I think it's the way a lot of empires end. Everything gets easy, and without the survival element to keep people honest, over generations the people just lose touch with reality. They think migrant caravans are coming. They think all they need to do is half-ass their way through college and they deserve to get out make six figures still half-assing it. they think Trump is a genius, they think their adult kids are off the pills. The adult kids don't really grasp what the pills are really going to do to them and everyone around them, because everything's been mostly fine so far. Et cetera.

Speaking as another old guy, I wish I could disagree with you on your conclusion. 🥲

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 33 points 10 months ago

A political party is a collection and assemblage of individuals who share a set of beliefs and principles and policy views about the United States of America.

Remember when the Republican party simply didn't put out a party platform running up to the 2020 election? They released a one page document that just said "We stand for whatever Donald Trump wants." That was weird, huh?

[-] blivet@artemis.camp 22 points 10 months ago

That was the point where the Republicans ceased even pretending to be a normal political party and embraced their new identity as a fascist death cult. They don’t even have a platform. They literally stand for nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Wait, seriously? That happened?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago

Former judge. Regardless, at this point, if you're still holding on to the label "Republican" for yourself, you're complicit.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] OttoVonBizmarkie@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Lindsay Graham was right about one thing!

[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

This guy actively attacks the LQBTQ+ community, all the while being one himself, if the rumors are to believed.

[-] OttoVonBizmarkie@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I think those rumors are most likely true.

[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If it weren't for NDAsI think the world would be a better place. The rich and powerful get to hide their embarrassing and or criminal behavior with the help of the judicial system. As designed I suppose, but wish it were different

[-] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

There's a reason why an extremely anti-lgbt republican who's actually just in the closet is almost a cliche nowadays

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

American democracy has by most measures been in grave peril since 6 January 2021, the day Pence, as vice-president, took Luttig’s advice and refused to attempt to block congressional certification of Joe Biden’s election win.

Trump, 77, pleaded not guilty, as he has to 74 other criminal counts, in New York over hush-money payments to a porn star and federally regarding his retention of classified information.

In New York this week, regarding a civil suit in which Trump was found liable for defamation and sexual assault, a judge said it was not defamatory to call the former president a rapist.

Nonetheless, Trump leads Ron DeSantis of Florida, Pence and the rest of the field by more than 30 points, firmly on course to face Biden again.

Luttig told CNN: “A political party is a collection and assemblage of individuals who share a set of beliefs and principles and policy views about the United States of America.

A respected conservative judge who was considered for the supreme court under George W Bush, Luttig made a tremendous impact with his January 6 testimony.

I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023

411 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers

3062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News