[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What is happening to the soil? You are not just watering it, it looks like it gets moved around a lot?

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Correct, much more grip and torque.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

So you want to focus on some niche stuff? Leave out the stuff that would not change and currently causes most of the issues?

Why should this type of fashion, for example, even change in communism? People want to look different than others, better, prestige, blablabla many reasons that would not change.

I ask again, how would communism make us sustainable? I do not see it. Some niche stuff is replaced by something else in communism, not worth mentioning. A new phone every year is bad, but not the big problem. People drive 13'500 miles per year on average in the USA, burning 10'000 barrels daily or 1 billion m³ each year, 3 m³ per person each year. Add to that all the fuel for heating homes and making electricity. That is our big problem.

Look at where the CO2 comes from. Heating, electricity, transport and agriculture alone are more than 50 %. Compare that to aviation and shipping, next to nothing. Even an of industry is nothing compared to that. How much are these 4 things supposed to be reduced with communism? And why?

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

So of we just keep people poor... issue solved. Like someone in Africa or North Korea, they are not going to need more resources than what can be regenerated. Simply because they lack the means to do so.

If we assume a communism with the same level of technology, comfort, ... how would we avoid the exact same issue? Why would people suddenly not drive their own car mostly alone? Heat their homes in winter, causing a big portion of global CO2 emissions by doing so?

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Lol"

Do people in capitalism need more resources? Why? How much more?

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Usage triples <-> 15 % increase

Pick one. Triple is 300 % increase. Article says 15 % is the proportion using them, not the increase.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

They are great for hard cheese and nutmeg too.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 73 points 5 days ago

Must be fake news. Impossible.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

What is up with you % symbol? Why is something missing on the right side of the top circle?

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Natürlich ist es effektiv, wenn die Medien Unsinn verbreiten. Aber man kann auch nicht immer alles kritisch hinterfragen, so viel Zeit und Fachwissen hat niemand. Das unsere Journalisten selbst ab einer einfachen Zahl scheitern ist traurig.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Eheran

joined 11 months ago