FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

bounded exponential growth is also a form of exponential growth

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/logistic-population-growth/

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

youtube was never google video. Google video was a competitor to youtube, and perplexingly coexisted with youtube for several years after the google youtube aquisition.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 5 months ago

The downvote button is not the “I disagree” button.

Like it or not, that's how people generally use it.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I get what you are saying but I disagree. Such a question comes with an implication that whoever posed the question thinks both answers are valid, unless the context implies otherwise.

Edit: No wrongthink on feddit.de, got it.

Oh come on now, people disliking your opinion is not the same thing as you being silenced, get over yourself.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 15 points 5 months ago

really? I felt like I was having a stroke trying to parse it

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

yeah, many packages now defaults as snaps in ubuntu. firefox being a single but prominent example, the package on apt simply installs the snap now. You can get around that but you'll have to add mozillas repository. It's Canonical's proprietary thing so I guess it makes sense.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nothing really. Distros have different goals. Some distros have more access to bleeding edge updates than ubuntu.

Some don't like that ubuntu forces you to use the snap store, which is proprietary, with packages that are larger and run slow and hog a lot of memory compared to other package managers (such as apt)

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

That would make wi-fi 7 confusing when it doesn't introduce the 7ghz band.
Also wi-fi 6 would operate then not only on 6ghz but also on 2.4 and 5ghz, which, once again would make it not really align anyways.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I disagree. The number has never had anything to do with frequency.

see wi-fi 4, which operates on the 2.4 and 5ghz bands

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 33 points 6 months ago

This thread starts with a document literally proving people have been saying that exact thing for 30 years now.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We're all human.
In a way I'm both happy and sad I live in the time when places like twitter showed that for all to see.

view more: ‹ prev next ›