This was just what I was looking for. As a former biology stemlord my first introduction to dialectics was through Paul Cockshotts YouTube videos that attempt at tying the two together, which really appealed to me. And eventually I was able to apply dialectics after a few years to my own thinking, which more or less in tandem with historical materialism rewired my brain I think at a fundamental level (or in other words it sublimated to a new model for looking at the world).
So I think you've got something pretty cool/important going on here that can help a lot of people cross the event horizon of historical materialism so they can reach real Marxism-Leninism that is rooted in these concepts. That is to say in a bottom up intuitive understanding where you can "feel" the direction of history pull*1. And like time and history, when you cross that event horizon in your brain, you cannot go backwards.
Good luck to you and your research.
*1. as opposed to the "top down" way...which is still good and a huge step can only take us so far and one can still abandon Marxism. How can we say it accurately (idk)? It's the ML or Marxist version of trying on politics like clothes? Whilst that's good and where basically all of us start because ML positions best explain the BS in capitalism domestically and abroad (and offer solutions), we want people to reach that event horizon of intuitively feeling Hmat because when it "clicks", the doors suddenly blow open, and you cannot go back.
If you are not already up to date with the latest works, I think it is absolutely critical to read things by authors like Hudson and Varoufakis. Xi counts as modern too. Paul Cockshott has done good work on modern socialism too even if he said TERF things (I don't remember the specifics but iirc he did - doesn't invalidate his work though). There are more great authors today I'm sure others can recommend.
The classics are always good, but the modern works tell you how capitalism is operating in the specific environment of today. The classics were written for specific material conditions of their times. Some things are good but some things simply don't apply today. If we only focus on the classics we run the risk of becoming Maoists and even worse we end up lacking current knowledge.
The modern works also still teach you historical materialism/dialectics because thats what they're built on.