It feels lime we agree on the impact but disagree on whether it is bad or good. Treating the most vulnerable people in our society like criminals and further alienating them while pushing them further into poverty is the design and the effect. It is immoral. Did I misread you?
HalfEarthMedic
Sorry for not being clear.
We have 5 positions to fill, we elect 15 people. From those 15 we select 5 at random.
This way everyone who eds up in a position wants it and has been elected but no amount of influence or money can guarantee a certain result
More likely the other way a round, elect 15 members for 5 positions for example, every candidate has been endorsed in an election but no amount of party influence, marketing, or corruption can ever guarantee a result.
“Our social security system is designed to be there for Australians when they fall on hard times, which is why it’s important debt recovery processes must be fair and transparent,” Plibersek said.
Anyone who has actually had to rely on centrelink knows this to be untrue. The intent may be to help those who need it but the structural design assumes everyone is a welfare cheat until proven otherwise. If you do manage to prove that you're not a bludger you can get below poverty level amounts of money and if centrelink makes a mistake you're on the hook.
This is a small positive step but remember the context.
I 100% agree. If I were all powerful god emperor I would have local councils selected by a combination of sortition and election checked by regular public meetings. But within the limited Overton window of liberal democracy I'd settle for compulsory voting as a baby step in the right direction.
There's a reason Australia is know for dangerous animals.
I'm ideologically predisposed to favour local government over state government so I'm immediately suspicious with any attempt to overrule a local council.
I really need to sit down and go through this Coolgardie situation. My understanding of the bare bones is that the mining industry was screaming out for for more accommodation for miners. Coolgardie council responded by releasing some land for mining companies to build on and built their own "village". The building project was mismanaged and over budget and hasn't returned the revenue expected. Council tried to cover the shortfall by heavily increasing rates on miners which was overruled by the state govt. They have now been accused of doing nothing to get themselves out of this mess.
At a glance it looks to me like an underresourced council doing its best and overeaching and when it fell apart made a hard decision to tax higher to regain financial stability. It looks a lot like Perth wants to amalgamate Coolgardie into Kalgoorlie-Boulder and this is pretext.
But as I say, I need to be guarded with my judgement because of my ideological predisposition.
3 weeks to respond then its only a few weeks to the election. What is the point of this?
the number of guns each licence holder has is going up – gun owners now average more than four firearms for each licence.
So on our farm we have
- A shotgun(foxes and rabbits)
- A .22(never got rid of it)
- A .22 Magnum (kangaroos and sheep)
- An air rifle(fun)
- A .303(cows and wild pigs)
3 guns is close to an irreducible minimum for a large farm or a serious hunter. I imagine club shooters similarly 'need' around 3-4 guns for different events. An average of more than four on each license is not a shocking figure.
With the exception of illegally acquired guns there is very little in here that is concerning. The absence of semi automatic and pump action guns combined with registration tied to valid uses remains firm.
I wonder - and I do mean wonder, I'm not putting this forward as a firm theory - if the kids pick up on contempt for teachers from their parents. Certainly a lot of people either look down on teachers as lesser or alternatively see them as invalid authority figures.
I also think that there is a drift away from community and family raising children towards the parent being the only valid authority. This has been a century long drift and again I don't know how much this factors in.
This is the answer, plastic recycling has always been a scam. Waxed paper, cardboard, glass, anything else.
I'll concede that that is likely the case. The point remains it is an aggressively immoral way to structure a welfare organisation