HamManBad

joined 4 years ago
[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Write in Joe Biden, anything else is a vote for Trump

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

He was clearly blue MAGA

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago

The problem is that even a billionaire can't solve the problem, only a revolutionary transformation of society can solve it. Most ruling classes tend to perceive revolution as a fate worse than death, so bunkers are the only option left to them

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

He won't dump him, but I can see him saying "I don't know, I might fire him after we win, if he can't hack it." And never bring it up again, but his supporters cling to that to deflect all criticism of Vance

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

The best antichrist of my lifetime

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's true, JD could show character and sound judgement by voluntarily removing himself from the top of a presidential ticket. I didn't even consider that as a possibility for some reason

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

Ok but all of that was true up until the point you said that they were likely a Russian agent, they were clearly radicalized by the FBI

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

They literally can't

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Stop doing wanton adventurism

Yeah I definitely breathed a sigh of relief when it became clear that last month's shooter couldn't be associated with us

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

TPAB led to my interest in conscious hip hop. Also, getting told to "negotiate" with a very poor, sick old man who was selling a riding lawn mower made me question the moral neutrality of market exchanges

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy shit, learned something new today

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

You're just doing the "lobbying isn't corrupt, because it's legal" argument. It's pedantic. We're looking at how power is used objectively, not at the expectations people have

view more: ‹ prev next ›