JamesFire

joined 1 year ago
[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

It's a package deal, really.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think it was less overt racism, but still pretty racist.

But mostly because Classism and Racism were pretty intertwined back in the day, what with non-white people essentially being entirely disallowed from actually being a higher class.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If I wanted good hardware I'd build a PC. Which I did.

If I wanted good games, I'd build a PC, buy a switch, and sail the seas for anything those can't run natively that I actually want to play. Which I did.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Does it get contaminated with something like the cooling water of a nuclear power plant?

This doesn't happen unless the reactor was sabotaged. Cooling water that interacts with the core is always a closed-loop system. For exactly this reason.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You should read what the electoral college does, because that's not what it does.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There are no downvotes, so I'm not sure what point you think you're making.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ben Garrison is a right-wing idiot. He doesn't know jack about much of anything.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah fairly certain it was a mustang. Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to show my friend anything without finding it again, just because it seems it was indeed modified.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Man, I couldn't even find any cars that had it. I was obviously googling the wrong things.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Elsewhere, I went through and I'm pretty sure it is a mustang now.

This one looks kinda close, thinking it was a modified one

https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/ford-mustang-convertible-2004.html

I don't think I'll actually find a decent image of it without finding it again, as it seems it was modified.

 

The name of the brand and car was stamped onto the side, in front of the driver's door, in that stamped metal lettering. It was some cursive font. I don't exactly remember what it said, and I already tried searching on my own, but I think it said corvette c2 or something like that. I may be misremembering entirely, but it was definitely

It had 6 rear red taillights, rectangular in shape, oriented vertically, in 2 groups of 3 on each side of the car. Like -> ||| |||

The car was red (I realize this likely doesn't help, but it's here anyway), with a spoiler. It was either a convertible, or had no roof at all.

The brand logo at the front of the car was not standing up on an ornament.

When I tried searching, I just couldn't find the taillight orientation at all, let alone the right car :D

It was fairly boxy and angular, which makes me think it's a bit older.

If there's any other details that might be helpful, ask and I might remember.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Damn, it's almost like this choice should be up to the worker, not the company, or something.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe they are, but it's not "absolutely zero" like you said.

view more: next ›