Looking at your profile, Lemmy itself seems to be saying your account is 3 weeks old. I don't know what exactly is going here.
I feel you w.r.t. debugging :-)
Thankfully there's always the "brute-force" approach to the rescue; scale up and/or ship in whatever you need from a planet where it's cheap(er).
If I'm not mistaken, inserters will always take from either the first or last occupied slot in a container that matches their filters. I'm not in front of my PC so I can't check, but I'm fairly certain it's not random at all. From your description of your setup (miners -> recyclers -> train) I suspect the "randomness" you're seeing is due to how the train wagon gets filled up by the recycler output - which is itself definitely random.
As another comment says, you'll need to use filters to have the inserters do a "balanced pull". If you want maximum throughput then you'll need to wire up some combinators to dynamically adjust the filters over time. If you don't care about achieving max throughput and just want to be sure you don't clog up the unloading, you only need to spread out the ten-ish scrap recycling outputs across the filters for the 6/12 inserters that interact with a given train wagon.
Mass Effect : Legendary Edition est à 6 euros. J'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit des 3 premiers jeux ainsi que la totalité des dlc sortis pour eux.
Aw, geee, thanks! It's been a while since I figured in a meme
Well, now that I made this post lemmy is finding cross-posts of it..... at least none of them seem to be in this community.
On a au moins la base du monde diplomatique qui leur sert à faire leur fameuse carte des médias & leurs propriétaires !
Les données sont organisées en sept tableaux :
- personnes.tsv, medias.tsv et organisations.tsv contiennent les médias, personnes physiques ou morales actionnaires
- personne-media.tsv, personne-organisation.tsv, organisation-organisation.tsv et organisation-media.tsv détaillent les liens capitalistiques entre ces actionnaires et médias qu'ils possèdent
Mise à jour en décembre 2024
Dans la partie "sources" du poste originel
S'il arrive a ramener des gens voter à gauche, qui sinon sont trop perturbés par Mélenchon ou trop cyniques envers le PS ou EELV, alors tant mieux!
J'espère qu'il ne se fera pas trop entraîné dans le jeu des médias à se faire tirer dans les pattes les gauches entre elles alors qu'on a Macron encore et son gouvernement qui continue de dériver vers l'extrême droite.
New Pride Flag for the irradiated wastelands just stopped!
And surprise, surprise, almost half of his "I use Linux now guys" video is showing off the window manager hyprland, which got a lot of bad press over the past 2 years:
https://drewdevault.com/2024/04/09/2024-04-09-FDO-conduct-enforcement.html
10 ans trop tard, mais mieux vaut tard que jamais?
I think the reasoning expressed here is taking the wrong approach. The type of person in most need of convincing that we should consider ritual as an important (if not outright necessary) tool for changing society (especially if it's to "save" the environment) is the type of person for whom:
To convince such a person (for whom I expect Carl Sagan's words on science being a "candle in the dark" deeply resonate), I think it would be much more productive to talk about how we came to care so much about democracy and human rights given neither are, to my knowledge, falsifiable.
The acts of voting and holding an election are deeply secular rituals; we imbue them with power by performing them, and we perform them because we view them as imbued with power (specifically, the power to confer legitimacy on the decision made by their own outcome). Similarly, writing down on a piece of paper that human beings should be treated on equal footing has been effectively ritualized[0] to help convince others - including those born long after the paper was written on - that we should act as if it were true, despite any evidence our senses may provide us for the contrary.
A third, even more mundane example of a secular ritual is when two parties sign a contract.
A fourth, much more fun example of a secular ritual is gift-giving on certain significant moments in time - birthdays, anniversaries, Christmas.
I would wager this hypothetical reader-in-need-of-convincing thinks all four of these rituals are good - for them, for everyone, and also just plain Good. They don't need to be scientifically proven to "work" so much as they need to be scientifically "cleared of harm" - we don't give up on contracts just because they can be used for harm, we pass laws so that we can ignore and/or annul any harmful contracts that might otherwise take effect. Similarly, maybe we can make "coexisting with the environment" sacred without involving notions of heaven, hell, or any sort of higher power. We certainly seem to want to treat human rights as sacred, even though that isn't a perfect approach either.
In any case, I would have been much more receptive to this line of reasoning back when I would have dismissed the article itself as not-that-deep and somewhat fetishistic.
[0]: both by repetition and by continued transmission of reverence. Not only have there been multiple signings of declarations of human rights over the years, many of them were directly inspired by previous one(s). From the USA's "bill of rights" to the French "Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen" to the UN's "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", most continue to be taught about in Western education as being important milestones for society as well having a net good impact on us.