Jedikkeneus

joined 2 weeks ago
MODERATOR OF
ModlogAbuses
Adjacenting
Quebec
sorted by: new top controversial old
Anyone fancy themselves a newer Q&A community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

It's actually one of the few where I've never seen any Social Justice Warriors.

Anyone fancy themselves a newer Q&A community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Local as in instance-wise.

Anyone fancy themselves a newer Q&A community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Albeit nothing local to offer. The ones you've mentioned have their own pros and cons too. The one you're associated with didn't see action for a week or so after it was started up, before the poor guy who broke the silence got banned.

2
Anyone fancy themselves a newer Q&A community? (sh.itjust.works)
Dessalines, .ml admin, head Lemmy dev: "Putin isn't an idiot! And he's not throwing people to a meat grinder! He's gloriously fighting the West! That's a BAN!" in c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 hours ago

You say that like I ever said I wasn't Leni (or that OP is me). The original community that had me (in which I am not banned) had shut down and I alternated. Here I am simply mentioning something I can verify happens. I know it's a habit of reactionaries, but I see no need to get hostile towards me simply for existing. Is it not possible to get along?

Dessalines, .ml admin, head Lemmy dev: "Putin isn't an idiot! And he's not throwing people to a meat grinder! He's gloriously fighting the West! That's a BAN!" in c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
The last time I checked, mods weren't supposed to be able to ban people from communities that those people never interacted in before. Did something change or is this a form of abuse/glitch/oversight? in c/lemmings_world_instance@lemmings.world
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Does it precede your ability to answer the question without giving an irrelevant remark though?

Anyone fancy themselves a fancier casual conversation community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Think a certain community if a certain day was a thing, all day every day.

Anyone fancy themselves a fancier casual conversation community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well now that you've asked, there's a connection issue. But the community in question goes by a different style of expression anyways. The two communities aren't really in a state of competition since they cater differently. Think of it as the uno reverso to the other one.

Does anyone know how to help a paraplegic squirrel? in c/ethology@mander.xyz
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

That much I did in a way. The small patio or opening outside the back door is closed off and has den features, and I left an old flat container out with water in it as well as some nuts.

Does anyone know how to help a paraplegic squirrel? in c/ethology@mander.xyz
8
Does anyone know how to help a paraplegic squirrel? (sheezy.art)
 

I was in the yard of an old place of residence. One of the squirrels happened to have made its legs useless, presumably from a fall. As one can see, I recorded it trying to run from me (and failing; don't worry, I just startled it and didn't do anything to it) as I stepped out of the backyard door. What would you advise?

Anyone fancy themselves a fancier casual conversation community? in c/communitypromo@lemmy.ca
7
Anyone fancy themselves a fancier casual conversation community? (sh.itjust.works)
Anon loves The Lord of the Rings in c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

Has he not heard of Ocarina of Time?

8
What classes did you succeed and fail at? (sh.itjust.works)
10
Musk's lawyers claim he has never used a computer (actually sounds accurate when you think about it) (www.msn.com)
-2
A question for a certain Frenchfryenjoyer (sh.itjust.works)
 

Let's say you make an association, and it aims to address errors in records that are supposed to detail wrongdoing. Naturally the same scrutiny extends to reports, right?

Let's say you have two sides that are at odds. However, they both recount things differently or interpret the same events differently. You would ask for proof, right?

My question for a certain @frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world is, do you have any smoking guns? All I see are arguments over pedantic details and claims where the so-called evidence is no more conclusive than the verdict at the beginning of 12 Angry Men (or My Cousin Vinny if you want to use a more fun example).

Some people have complained of others going around reporting everything they say in certain communities as a way to get them banned everywhere, often depending on the mods' carelessness over relevance or investigation.

view more: next ›