Joncash2

China's not angry, they're just clarifying. The agreement on the tariffs after April 2nd were reduced to 10% on both sides. Additionally, for the fentanyl tariffs, China has other countermeasures in place that will be removed if the fentanyl tariffs are removed. How are people reading this as if China is angry. Why would China be angry about something they agreed to?

Actually it's not for China. That was China's promise to the world. No matter what happens as long as you don't block trade from me China will trade with you. They even do this with Taiwan, and believe me, China always keeps it's word.

There are countries accused of all sorts of things, yet China will never stop trading. Russia, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Serbia, Egypt, I could go on. What does this say to BRICS nations if China picked a side. They're trapped by their own promise. But it's one that keeps them consistent regardless of how the world turns.

You got nothing, noted.

China is investing in Crimea, yes.

https://worldcrunch.com/world-affairs/chinese-investment-in-crimea-is-political-backing-for-russia/

*Edit. like how your trying to find inconsistencies in Chinese policy. The best part about China is they are always consistent. So I knew the answer to your question before even looking it up with no prior research.

*Edit 2. I also love how the west is saying the same thing your saying. It's political, it makes China look bad. Take my side China sempai

Yes Russia is.

https://www.rferl.org/a/crimea-property-seizures-ukrainians-targeted-by-russia/33410669.html

Please, explain the difference, I am blind.

Was that a declaration by the UN that Israel is settler colonists? Is Russia? Who gets to decide that label. Why is Israel but not Russia?

So you agree with the west that China should have sanctioned Russia and sent weapons to Ukraine? After all, checks notes according to the west Russia is genocidal settlers. Who decided that label?

Your the one insulting China. The moral is that no nation regardless of size or power gets to make any decisions about another nation. There's another super power who goes around telling people how to run their country, so if you want China to be as amoral as USA, well too bad. China's morals are clear. They will not ever push their will on your nation or people. If you can't understand that pushing your will upon others is amoral, then I don't know what to tell you.

It's funny, is China critically supporting Russia? What about Myanmar? What about Venezuela? Those are all claims that western nations claim China is doing. Who defines critical support? What makes it critical? What gives you the right to accuse China of critical support? Are you CNN or Fox news?

If you support China, then you support China's neutrality. This has been stated many times by China itself. It cannot be the one to unilaterally make a decision on what a nation is or is not. It's not China's place. Thus, it will not change the rules of normal business UNLESS there's a global agreement. You're literally telling China to be a king maker, they are not and never will be.

No China cannot do better. You're asking China to make decisions for other people and other nations. China refuses and never will. China is not the one who decides who is fascist or who is democratic or whatever. Thus, China will not change the normal rules of business without a global agreement.