Kacarott

joined 1 month ago
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Honestly her liking him or just pretending is irrelevant. Start by learning "offering to rub someone's feet (or any other somewhat intimate touching) is NOT a good way to flirt, even if they do like you!"

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Norway. There are many reasons, but the big big one for me is the absolutely incredible nature AND the ability to properly enjoy it via Wildcamping. Being able to simply venture out into the forest for a weekend is such a nice thing.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Think about it. If the only purpose was a desire to kill the person, why write a song, why not actually do it? The obvious answer is, because he knows that would be wrong, so writing a song about it instead is a way to vent and express emotions.

The topic of the song is literally about killing someone, but that is not why it was made (how could it be, writing a song doesn't kill someone) and it's not why people listen. There is more to art than the literal subject matter.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To be fair, this applies to any bed

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I like this, but I think that the goal to be tested must be a set of tests which are agreed upon by a large majority, not just the current party in power. That way there can be tests as to how effective the law is, but also tests whether it is having other unwanted side effects.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

A pot plant which he might try take care of for a while before realising it's plastic, but has already grown attached to it.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm currently reading a book which argues that "most people, deep down, are actually pretty decent". It's really good, highly recommend to anyone. It's called "Human Kind" by Rutger Bregman

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

not the online assholes

Honestly you've made yourself seem like an online asshole here. Who else besides an asshole ragebaits people for their own enjoyment?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I dunno, I kind of care because I find the things they get butthurt about tend to be quite interesting and worth watching/reading.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 19 points 1 month ago

If I was rich I would live wherever made me happy, probably somewhere with lots of nature, and I'd be happy to pay my share in taxes cus I can trivially afford it.

It would be incredibly depressing to be rich but only find joy in hoarding money.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Well first, I don't think that "is ok to eat meat" is a moral. But it's true that humans haven't tended to find it immoral (though there are exceptions to this in certain cultures, regarding certain meats).

But you make a good point, and I think the answer is that since humans make morals based on their circumstances, and the circumstances of society can and does change, then certain morals become less relevant compared to others. Murder is a fairly constant moral, because regardless of how a society changes, a murderous individual is gonna be bad for it. But on the other hand, there used to be pretty strong morals regarding how dead bodies were treated; you leave them alone. And this used to make sense, since people who messed with dead bodies were likely to get diseases and spread them. But as medicine and science and hygiene improved, this became less relevant as compared to the need to investigate dead bodies to improve understanding of disease and human biology. So our common morals regarding respect for the dead changed.

For veganism, it used to be for most societies that they couldn't afford to simply not eat things, unless they were poisonous. So this need overwhelmed morals of kindness to nature and animals, even though this moral of kindness was still there (respecting nature is a moral found in very many cultures). But in modern day when we now have an abundance of food to the point of large waste, the need to eat whatever you can is no longer as important, and the moral of kindness to animals (and the environment) can be expressed more freely.

And indeed, I think the vast majority of vegans would agree that eating meat is not inherently immoral if there is no other choice, it's only when meat is chosen over other alternatives that it becomes immoral, because it is unnecessary.

Sorry for the wall of text

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a fair point, I was mostly thinking that many people consume far too much meat, and that reducing it would be healthy, but if it's only being replaced with trash then it wouldn't be any better

view more: ‹ prev next ›