I've met so many people who think that interacting with other humans online is dystopian and dehumanizing and nothing like 'real' interaction, while also thinking that to read a book is to experience a deeply intimate connection to the author on a spiritual and intellectual level.
Munrock
joined 2 years ago
David Rovics
Song for the Houthi Army: https://youtu.be/GJugXEu-nQ0
St. Patrick Battalion: https://youtu.be/XQ9_y3tyeFI (lots of covers of this one out there)
Commandante Fidel Alejandro Castro-Ruz: https://youtu.be/blIj9oeS-m0
It just so happens that under Russian rule, Russian rulers will be making profit instead of Ukrainian rulers.
I think we're missing a couple of nuances here, no? Although it's a stretch to call them nuance. The way Ukrainian rulers have been making money has been through privatization. And because there's so much privatization we need to look at who owns Ukraine's economy. It's only escalated since Russia invaded, with national assets being sold off to foreign private sectors so cheaply that one has to wonder why they did it when the gains are a drop in the bucket compared to the direct aid they've been getting from Western public sectors.
If Ukraine emerges from this conflict with its own sovereignty, it'll be sovereignty over a flag, a presidential palace and a state framework that protects foreign companies' investments from hungry Ukrainians.
Like Homelander
How could you walk away with a different interpretation?
With a great deal of obstinance and a determination to reach the conclusion you intended to reach going in. Monolectical Idealism™.
Those feel like legitimate worries.
Legitimate worries, but still a drop in the bucket compared to the death and misery that US foreign policy is serving up. Of course, thousands of deaths from direct bombing and sanctions starvation doesn't weigh up to bodily autonomy oppression when the latter are voters and the former are half a world away.
Meanwhile Jill Stein is anti-war, pro-Palestine and pro-bodily autonomy, but ask any liberal why they refuse to vote for her and it's because they don't want to 'waste their vote' because every other liberal isn't voting for her.
The survey disproportionately sampled from urban populations over rural. It's not representative of the whole Chinese population.
It's a study by a US university about China, cited in an article about China by the Guardian. I knew I was going to find something like that before even opening the link. One would hope that after Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan, the Guardian would no longer have any credibility re China in this community.
China is 1.8 billion people. It's moving slowly on progressive issues, but it's moving forward. What it's not doing is following the West's example, where it rushes forward on progressive issues at the behest of half the population and then rolls back again next election cycle, letting capitalists commodify progressive virtue, letting the political classes use it as a wedge to divide and rule, and causing the slower half of the population to drag the country into fascism every now and then.
Yes that's my plan. I'm definitely smart enough to be one. I just need to wait for the right opportunity.
The founding fathers, in their infinite wisdom, designed the three branches of the government of the United States of America to have a series of checks and balances to protect their fragile republic from threats such as this. Now we all get to see it in action:
The Judicial branch has ruled that Google is an illegal monopoly and should be broken up, but it doesn't have the power to do so directly, it has to advise the Legislative and Executive branches to do it. However, the 4th and 5th branches of government - the CIA and the Lobbies - both want Google to remain intact. The CIA finds Google's tech dominance extremely useful, and the Lobbies' patrons make a lot of money from it.
So, the Judicial branch advises the Legislative and Executive branches what they should do, but before they do anything the CIA and the Lobbies review the advice and then tell the Legislative and Executive branches what they will do, which in this case will probably be some massive (small for Google) fines.
See? Checks and balances! The different moving parts all working together to ensure that the Government serves the people it was created to serve.
Economic Scholar TH3H3LLR41S3R gives us the lowdown on Capatism.
Poor Stephen.