NateNate60

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 146 points 2 years ago (6 children)

When real life does not match up with the description given by social rejects on a site notorious for infidelity

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would encourage you to look up "user-friendly Linux distros" on your favourite search engine and check the first few results.

PopOS is System76's distro. It's quite popular among beginners and frequently recommended to those just starting with Linux. I don't personally use it.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 79 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Bernie Sanders meme tenplate is perfect for this

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Again, I want to remind you that a $1,000 phone winning against a $150 phone is not a victory at all. The iPhone should have absolutely kerb-stomped mine. The fact that it is even competitive is the point I am trying to make.

You can visualise a sort of bell curve of battery life. My phone is probably somewhere around the 30-40th percentile (and note that a 90th percentile phone is not 2× better, it's probably only 50% better). A bit worse than average but not terrible. It's a cheap phone, after all.

But the issue is that (new) Apple phones I presume are placing consistently around the 60th percentile, which is good and better than average. The issue is that you're paying 80th-percentile prices for 60th-percentile performance. That is the point I'm trying to make. It's relative performance to price, not absolute performance. These numbers are made up but illustrate the point I'm trying to make.

If the iPhone were priced at $400-500, it'd be an excellent value and I would recommend it to a lot more people. That's what I feel a comparable Android would cost. Maybe it could go up to $550 since Apple products do have better build quality and the Apple ecosystem, but at $700 for the latest base model iPhone 14, I think it's just not delivering the value for money compared to Android phones. Of course, that's my opinion. I make decisions based on hardware. Others may make decisions based on the fact that they like the iOS experience and the ecosystem it provides, or even because they just like using Apple products. And yes, the fact that Apple products are of consistently above-average quality does count for something.

I'm not attacking you if you own an iPhone and like it, and I don't judge you for it. I will criticise Apple though, because I feel that Apple is short-changing their customers on the technical side by providing mediocre hardware for not-mediocre prices.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Company prioritises profits.

Big news.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The context of my original comment is the base iPhone model. Nonetheless, it's still to be noted that the default charger that came with your iPhone 11 (18 W, not 20 W) still delivers 45% less power than the default 33 W charger that came with my OnePlus Nord N20 5G.

From what I can read online, it takes one hour to go from 0 to 80% on an iPhone 11 Pro using the default charger. It takes my phone a bit over half an hour.

Remember, I am comparing an iPhone with an MSRP of $999 to a phone that I bought for $150. Refurbished iPhone 11 Pros still sell for $300.

I believe that my point that iPhones have comparatively poor chargers for their price point stands. Charging technology has not changed significantly from then to now. The effect of Apple's recalcitrance is that even the cheapest Android phones can run circles around iPhones when it comes to charging. I hope Apple with take this opportunity to deliver a better product for their users rather than making only incremental improvements to old technology.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Apple users really just didn't notice the limitations. Whether you consider that "working" is up to you.

Apple users are used to their phones taking ninety minutes to charge and not lasting the whole day. They consider that "normal" and are unlikely to consider that for Android devices, even cheap ones, sub-1 hour fast charging and all-day battery life are standard, not exceptions.

Apple's (previously) bundled charger is a measly 5 W whereas my cheap $150 OnePlus comes with a 33 W charger, delivering over six times as much power. Granted, Apple devices tend to be more power-efficient than others, but not six times less.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (11 children)

The base model of the iPhone still doesn't have USB 3 and won't have the latest USB-PD. The USB 2 standard was released over 20 years ago. The Lightning plug was released over 10 years ago. The plug technology on iPhones is seemingly being kept out of date on purpose. At least that is what people are complaining about.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 67 points 2 years ago (7 children)

In my opinion, all companies essential to national security should be nationalised. I mean the likes of Lockheed Martin as well. There should be no profit from war and we can't afford companies to chase profits against the interests of national security if we end up needing it.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Since I'm sure many people don't know: Yerevan is the capital city of Armenia.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

2022: OnlyFans wanted to ban porn

2023: Unity wants to kill free-to-play games

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I believe in the open-source world, this is called "mission creep". It means when a project gradually expands its scope and mission until it becomes unmaintainably broad.

view more: ‹ prev next ›