NewSmileadon

Thank you Jew goblin for your enlightening comment

Valid. Though it's more the effect of sex that drives the plot, not the performance itself.

Violence and action do drive plot. They can build character and be narratively cathartic. Sex in movies does not do that because sex is a subjective experience between two people.

Because one of John Wicks main reasons for existing is choreographed violence? And the violence is sort of character building in the way it shows John Wick's skill as a killer. There is a case to be made here where sex is sort of superfluous, because unlike John Wick, choreographed sex generally does not contribute to story beats unless it's a porno. And there's nothing unhealthy about being uncomfortable watching an intimate moment unless your porn addled brain has made you desensitizes to sex.

I think that happens when people ask how big a city could be instead of SHOULD be

This is the most fucking stupid take I've ever seen that it must be bait.

Explain further Dr Darwin

Dicks out for the king ✊

I'm not entirely sure why this sub's surety of beliefs is based on criticizing other religions', instead of propounding how their beliefs could be better for society. Unless there is some elusive reason no religion in society is better than any system of faith.

You mean fascism conflicting with other ways of governmental thought? Yes. since I'm a fascist I'm invested in fascism winning. But we will see which governmental system is best fit for the time

Hes giving an example of how men on average have a tendency to do higher risk activity. It's a statistical observation, not an encompassing one. OP is giving a specific example where the statistical observation applies. Higher risk could be smoking, drinking, gambling, driving faster, gambling. You could counter me by showing a statistic where men on average do not engage in higher risk activity.