Can you explain?
Oneser
joined 2 years ago
Because the Republicans played the populist game better. This is not the first or last time people will willingly vote their own downfall into power.
Isnt this just a hybrid?
I'm sorry but this is completely unacceptable format for this media.
Can you please put this is a meme format and re-upload it as its own post? This image and caption needs its own safe space to be discussed in detail.
Regards, The world.
I have little to contribute, but could you please share your date sources for the numbers started?
I would be interested to see how salary data could be aggregated reliably in countries with significant differences in population.
The same reason you like eating caramelised onions, but not onion skins.
System based exclusives meaning you might not be able to play a game you want to in the future, expensive subscriptiona needed to play online, push to digital DRM controlled games.. it's almost like consoles killed themselves?
Unfortunately, been there and got the t-shirt. "Hey, it seems like you've got a lot to work on and I do too, I don't think this is a good time to pursue this"
I don't think I can agree on this take that without this bad actor, Europe would be without concerns. It seems too simple.
Resources are not equally distributed and conflict will always arise from conflicting private/corporate and/or national interests. If Russia was not there, another would likely take its place.
I do however agree that if everyone could think in a bigger picture beyond their own personal interests, we would be in a significantly better place.
I think it's more nuanced than that as the technologies needs time to mature and the supply chains need time to establish. The price of renewables, especially solar and wind, has plummeted faster than anyone ever expected, so arguably it's cheaper (economically) now.
There's also the saying "the best time to buy a house is always 50 years ago, the second best time is now". I don't see much benefit in regretting yesterday's decisions.
Little to none so far. This might change in the future, but not that quickly.
The additional renewable capacity added year on year is not enough to cover the additional electrical load, which originates mainly from 2 things: transport/infrastructure (including EVs, data centres, AI) & environmental loads (more heatwaves in populated cities, where people then need to cool).
As far as I understood, 2024 was a substantial year for the environmental side of the equation, otherwise additional renewables installations would have been able to cover just about all the additional power load.
Doesn't get more Tottenham than that!