Collectively agreeing to raising prices is anti-competitive collusion and illegal.
Collectively raising prices is anti-competitive coordination and legal.
Pandemic and supply shocks is a perfect excuse to do the latter.
Good luck to whoever is trying to solve this.
Unix people today : "NICE NICE"
Unix people today from 20:28:10 to 20:28:20 GMT : "NICE NICE NICE NICE"
The patent story reveals a lot.
Government:
Also government:
Donate to propublica.org - they produce a lot of great journalism.
Well, the far right faction of Republicans did already side with Dems to oust the speaker.
That's spoiling at that point
Do you think an average person in 13th century had a better quality of life than an average person living in the 21st century?
Is that a "random person on the Internet" take or something substantiated?
Most statements I don't have qualms with, but from my understanding, "liberals embrace ID politics" seems way off. I could see an argument that there's some kind of split across people who'd identify as or match a typical understanding of a liberal, along the ID politics line, given that it's so divisive. Id say liberal as a concept existed way before ID politics, do when that became prominent, a lot of people got split along that line. I.e. Far right probably split 90:10, Conservatives probably split 75:25, Liberals probably split closer to 50:50, while social left split 25:75, far left split 10:90 and libertarians split 1:99.
Hey, at least your average, retarded, left take seems to be (at least from my limited experience here) somewhat more palatable than your average, retarded, right take.
Data I've seen suggests otherwise. Care to engage with me so that we can figure out where the discrepancy lies?
That's way off topic, though.