Tarogar

joined 1 year ago
[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

"oh No, we have so much electricity and can now accelerate phasing out fossil fuels. What a tragedy!"

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago

Korrektur. Wie waren in der PV Industrie Weltmarkt führend. Bis ein Herr altmeier (danke CDU) das nach China verkauft hat.

Wir waren Weltklasse bei den Turbinen für Windkraft. Bis ein Herr altmeier (danke CDU) das abgesägt hat weil wir das "nicht brauchen".

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de -4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Real scenario: you wouldn't see that happen.

Hypothetically it could cause economic collapse because now there wouldn't be money to back up all the loans that are outstanding. Followed by mass layoffs of people and all the other fun stuff that comes with it.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Party size can be an important factor for any RPG but even the I highly doubt that more banter makes for deeper characters when banter is inherently surface level.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago

All of this is IMHO so keep that in mind.

Politically it's pretty extremist from what I can tell. Not just that but support for that extreme political stance is also rather high. Neithe of which is a good thing in my book. Other news I get to know about also tend to paint a pretty grim picture when it comes to human rights, rich/ poor divide and acceptance of people who have different preferences. I also mostly remember having met people how you described in the opening.

To say how it is, my opinion is not exactly good. Primarily because of how they act a d their political choices. Though I chalk some of that up to a lack of education. And it's also not so bad that I'd rather not deal with them. Just that I have a healthy dose of " oh no, not one of those guys again. This will get exhausting, isn't it" whenever I see someone that fits the description.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not illegal when you have to "consent" or basically be unable to use any chat service properly. At least that is what they seem to think. I am no legal expert in that matter but it's still shitty that they are effectively trying to force you to consent to it.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 18 points 4 months ago

Avoids law for four years. Finally gets fined a measly 200 million and one million every day from there on out till it's solved. Basically just an additional cost to do business instead of a punishment. Amazing.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

It is called a stable bank balance for a reason... Cause the money will eventually end up in the stable with the horses.

Still wouldn't trade it for something else.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago

Die FAZ als seriös darzustellen halte ich für zweifelhaft. Die meisten Medien Konzerne sind weder besonders seriös noch besonders gut. Egal ob links oder rechts angesiedelt.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 13 points 4 months ago

Nicht so konservativ... 6° oder gar nichts. Nachher meint die Bevölkerung noch das wir DiE gRüNeN sind und das geht ja gar nicht!

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well... Great that I don't need to worry about it but I still need to worry about it for my horses. So believe it or not. I would still work to afford that.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago

If it helps to put it into more perspective. Those conservatives or CDU somewhat recently visited republicans in the US and figured that it might be a good idea to copy how they do politics in the US to apply it in Germany. But making noise is unfortunately what works even if it's not actually correct or an issue at all.

view more: ‹ prev next ›