UraniumBlazer

"Guess I will do what the wowmans do"

Hmm, interesting problem where I don't exactly have a good answer. But I would still support some form of criminalisation. If I fed my 3 year old cocaine while knowing it was cocaine, should I not be jailed for abuse? Is this situation not similar?

I'm not very confident in answering this, but this is my answer- Knowing that ur kid will have genetic defects is very easy if you know that your partner is your sibling, no? To know the other genetic traits, you would have to consciously conduct genetic tests n stuff. But not so much for incest.

Interesting.

Direct family incestuous offspring seems to have a 50% chance of having genetics disorders.

The stuff for first cousins is even more interesting!

In April 2002, the Journal of Genetic Counseling released a report which estimated the average risk of birth defects in a child born of first cousins at 1.1–2.0 percentage points above the average base risk for non-cousin couples of 3%, or about the same as that of any woman over age 40.[218] In terms of mortality, a 1994 study found a mean excess pre-reproductive mortality rate of 4.4%,[219] while another study published in 2009 suggests the rate may be closer to 3.5%.[2] Put differently, a single first-cousin marriage entails a similar increased risk of birth defects and mortality as a woman faces when she gives birth at age 41 rather than at 30.[220]

The above is from Wikipedia.

So basically, banning incestuous childbirth for first cousins is equivalent to banning women from having children when above 41 years old.

I am being dead serious. Memes aside, we need to question the logic behind every single thing that we believe in. That is exactly what I am attempting to do. I would encourage you to do the same :)

I can't see how two consenting adults wanting to marry is an issue. Sure, having biological kids born out of incest should be criminalized as that comes under child abuse (going ahead with a pregnancy where the probability of the child having to suffer a birth defect is very high.).

Let's say I want to marry my first cousin. Both of us are 22 and 24. We are both adults. Why should society get to decide what we can and cannot do? If you say "love is love" and support this bill, you are a hypocrite.

The cunts and bhenchods in one empire? Never seen that before!

I mean... That's just like saying that noone would want to be trans because society would be asshole-ey to you...

Okay, what I meant was "how is this acceptable". More like "how is this normally accepted?" or "how is everyone just okay with this".

But your answer does provide very valid points for the causal points behind this.

And I bet it helps with SEO which probably means that an English title can increase your income.

Makes sense. Which makes it so scummy! Inconvenience thousands just to gain a few more views...

The reason for the ratio is because this is very close to a pedophilia apologist viewpoint blurring the lines between attraction and consent.

I don't understand. Do pedophile apologists say that consent isn't necessary if one is attracted to kids or something? Like those rape defenders who invoke nature to say "rape happens in animals, hence there is nothing immoral about rape in humans"?. Sorry if I come off as a little dense. I am unaware of this viewpoint (in fact, I've never really discussed about this topic with anyone before).

If they are an adult with the body of a twelve year old, why would another adult be sexually attracted to them (their body)?

Cuz they're likely a pedophile. But this wouldn't be immoral as the other party has all the knowledge and experience of a consenting adult.

At what point is the line between respecting an individual's autonomy to present as a minor, and sexually objectifying actual minors?

I imagine that minors are sexually objectified either ways. Like... A pedophile probably thinks of some kid while masturbating, no? How's that different from having sex with an adult who looks like a kid?

Because it is very easy to read the original post as "nah, it's not pedophilia, they're technically legal!"

But that is what it is a little, no? Forget legality, I'm talking more on morality grounds. According to my definition of pedophilia, you would still be a pedophile if u were attracted to kid-like people. But in this case, consensual sex would be permissible as no damage is being done to anyone (as both parties can consent).

We got people out there that orgasm from popping balloons

WHAT. I wanna see porn of that lmao. Like... Do they moan n stuff when they hear balloons popping? Or would they orgasm after hearing gunfire considering that sounds similar sometimes? Would they be horny constantly in a warzone??? I have so many questions...

I do not follow. What are mangakas?