I heard this once back in 2011 while driving alone through the country at night. Just a weird, pulsing hum. Then it vanished just as quickly as it started. It's funny that people have been studying it for so long and still have no idea what causes it.
There'd be an inevitable moment where you get up in the night for a glass of water, walk into the family room, and just see a blackened Elvis staring up at you.
I didn't play the remake because of the name changes. I still have my Gamecube copy and the PS2 special edition, so will probably go back to those next time nostalgia bites.
Thank you then! It seems like our debate stemmed from different definitions. Based on your definition of what constitutes AI, Data would absolutely count. By my definition, he is too advanced to be in the same category. But I get the impression that we would both agree that he is more advanced than any modern AI system. Once again, I'm sorry for coming across as condescending; I will have to choose my words more carefully in the future!
This seems to have descended into a debate on "what is consciousness", which as I originally said, is a question that isn't easy to answer. My point was that modern AI inherrently isn't aware of what it's saying, not that it couldn't be defined as an intelligence. As far as I know, there's no solid evidence to prove that it can. To finish, I would like to apologise if my initial comment came across as condescending. I didn't mean to come across as such.
While I appreciate the philosophical take, it seems that you've misunderstood what AI is.
Have you ever been typing out a text and seen that your phone is recommending a list of words for you to select next? This is an example of AI. Your phone has been programmed with a list of words and a set probablility of one word following the other. For instance, if you type "I", it will almost certainly suggest "am", because there's a high probabibility of that being correct. More advanced AI, like ChatGPT work the same way, only on a grander scale. It has no idea what its words mean, but through clever programming can create the illusion that it does.
Data on the other hand is explicitly stated to have a human-like consciousness. His posotronic brain is no different than a human brain, besides being artificial.
Naturally, this brings up the age old philosophical debate on "what actually is consciousness". The simple answer is that we still don't have a good explanation. You could argue that humans also follow an algorithm, just far more advanced, but I would argue that this doesn't satisfactorily explain how humans are able to extrapolate their own ideas from abstract concepts.
Technically no, since data is a full on artificial life form. Modern AI is just programmed to create the illusion of sentience.
To be fair, you could probably fix this up quite nicely if you had the money (assuming it's not listed).
This is a library for people who don't read.
That's good to hear at least! I've heard mixed things from different people, but it just doesn't strike me as something I want to invest three hours into. I'm glad you enjoyed it though!
I'm not OP, but I feel like I want to add on to this if that's alright. I think it's often easy to get into this mindset when a trend seems to overtake a lot of the industry. For instance, personally I've noticed a common game that seems to get churned out a lot in recent years: it's open world, but has nothing in it and is given light RPG elements that don't really add anything. That doesn't mean every game is like that, of course, but I think it can be easy to fixate on what we're tired of seeing. Eventually, someone will come up with a new trend, and the empty open world games will fade out, and the cycle will continue as it always has. It's also interesting to point out that humans tend to remember the past more fondly, so it's easy to remember old gems and ignore the flops. Anyway, thanks for entertaining my ramble.
VioletTeacup
joined 1 year ago
Since I haven't seen them listed yet: