Twitter requires an account to view replies too though right? So is the unique obstacle is payment to make an account?
ZWQbpkzl
He is popular and you're just jealous.
Canceled for fucking too many women in Louis XVI's court.
Do we not have something like xcancel for truth.social? Its just a mastadon server like bluesky right? Or maybe its been forked for a long time.
One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it’s the “HOTTEST” Country anywhere in the World.
What does this even MEAN? His brain is as cooked as Brandon's but they can't hide it. There's a very good chance he is talking about physical heat.
Holy fuck. Holy fuck. There's so much to unpack like every three sentences, but I'm stuck on this one:
Kash Patel, and the FBI, must be focused on investigating Voter Fraud, Political Corruption, ActBlue, The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020, and arresting Thugs and Criminals, instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein.
- OK Yes President Trump the Epstein conspiracy is exclusively the domain of the RADICAL LEFT, thank you.
- ActBlue?
What conspiracies does the far right have around ActBlue? Like theres the clear material explanation that this is a major source of DNC funding and the GOP wants to cut it off. But there's probably some conspiracies around it if he's begging the qanon crowd to focus on it.
ActBlue, along with NGPVan, is a major obstacle to starting a third party, such that DSA is internally constructing replacements for both of them.
No fucking way that's real. No way qanon freaks are actually making him cry like that.
- The Anubis homepage uses the new meta-refresh strategy which should work on lynx since its doesn't use JavaScript.
- I doubt you even saw an Anubis challenge. Anubis normally configured by User-Agent. IDK what lynx's User-Agent is but I bet Anubis wasn't configured to challenge it.
Related turn your app into a residential proxy.
Ethical way to monetize apps on Windows, Android, and Fire Stick
By ethical it means you bury an agreement in the terms and services.
The FSF is ideologically incapable of implementing bot management strategies because they value internet anonymity. Bot evasion strategies are literally just advanced ways of being anonymous. You can't tell if a person is a bot or not without violating their anonymity or internet freedom.
Anubis is a modest compromise. It checks if you can run JavaScript and blocks those who can't. It's not perfect. It'll block elinks/lynx users or a real person using curl. But it'll also block any bot that doesn't use a browser, which accounts for most of the volume.
The "cryptomining" and "malware" comparisons against Anubis or hyperbolic but sort of true. Proof of Work is the dumbest and most wasteful possible strategy to combat bots. It's not the hashing that stops bots, its the check if they can run JavaScript that does.
Anubis has a new javascriptless metarefresh which uses HTML to refresh the page after a few seconds. This is a much better solution than the computational proof of work, in my opinion. This line from the docs though is perplexing:
This is not enabled by default while this method is tested and its false positive rate is ascertained. Many modern scrapers use headless Google Chrome, so this will have a much higher false positive rate.
The false positive rate will be the same as proof of work minus however many bots run headless browser with JavaScript disabled. Proof of Work doesn't give you positives or negatives, it's a flat tax.
IIRC the letter was sent regardless.