Oof.
"Why? Because Trump"
Can't wait for these four years to be over. Not because I like him, but because I dislike him being brought up time and again for the sake of engagementbait.
Oof.
"Why? Because Trump"
Can't wait for these four years to be over. Not because I like him, but because I dislike him being brought up time and again for the sake of engagementbait.
Cars as a service? That might be debatable.
But taking the human factor out of driving cars and trucks is going to save millions of lives worldwide. That's the inevitable safety progress I was talking about in my comment.
It's not just the automotive industry that would be worried, that's incredibly short-sighted. The transport sector, however, should be terrified. The amount of chauffeurs required in a few decades time will be just a few percentage of today's amount.
And that, in turn, will have major ramifications for the social securities (UBI, anyone?)
But sure, let's start with the American car makers, so they can lobby against this inevitable progress in safety.
Meanwhile, in the real world, creators just want to setup an account and sell their content. Not having to deal with payment processors, setting up cdns port handling customer support themselves.
There's enough to complain about how OnlyFans impacts society (like creating fake interactions with customers who think they're interacting with the real deal). But them wanting a cut for doing all the technical middleman stuff is actually reasonable.
No need for these kind of inflammatory comments, the article itself is bad enough.
If you read the article, you would have seen that, yes, the perpetrator is serving a 20 year sentence.
About that 20% cut - I'm not going to argue about what amount would be fair, but for that money they do handle all the payment, distribution and infrastructure. In that sense it's more comparable to Steam, Apple, Google etc.
But that's getting pretty off-topic.
Interesting title.
What could OnlyFans have done to prevent this?
Absolutely.
The only reason Chrome has been slowing down the deprecation of 3rd party cookies is because it would make it harder to do privacy invading tracking, and thus, would make Google less money.
No browser benefits from tracking. Only ad companies do.
Meanwhile, nobody has attempted to give a definition. Lots of downvotes all around though. 🤷🏼♀️
I figured zionism had to do with an ideology, not a profession. Generalisations like these are not helping.
That's a no-brainer.
Thanks to the tests, it'll be easier to rewrite the unreadable code, plus you'll get a better understanding of the big picture.