[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

Not if they "learn history" by watching YouTube history channels.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 days ago

My name is Inigo Montoya

1
1
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/latinamerica@lemmygrad.ml

Venezuela President Maduro: "The United States has filled the whole world with war and misery in the name of a false freedom... Here, neither the gringos nor US Southern Command will ever govern again. In Venezuela, we Venezuelans are in charge... Oligarchs: Tremble!"

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 days ago

I have no experience with game development so i can't speak on what that takes, but the difficulty of modding very much depends on the game. Paradox games for instance are generally extremely easy to mod, pretty much anyone can learn to do it, though the skill ceiling can be quite high depending on how deep you want to get into more complicated scripting and/or 3D modeling new assets.

Whether or not these skills translate to making your own game i don't know. But if you are interested in giving that a try that i think the place to start is perhaps a tutorial for one of the more commonly used engines like Unity.

1

From "Four Decades of Poverty Reduction in China":

"Over the past 40 years, the number of people in China with incomes below US$1.90 per day has fallen by close to 800 million, accounting for close to three-quarters of global poverty reduction since 1980. At China’s current poverty standards, the number of poor people in China fell by 770 million. By any measure, the speed and scale of China’s poverty reduction is historically unprecedented."

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

With 30% of its total energy consumption coming from electricity (vs about 18% for the rest of the world) and electrifying "nine times faster than the rest of the world", China is becoming the world's "first major electrostate".

Source: https://rmi.org/insight/x-change-the-race-to-the-top/

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/latinamerica@lemmygrad.ml

Latin American comrades, who is this person and why haven't we heard more from him? He sounds extremely based.

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

A selected list of Chinese billionaires who have been ordered arrested or sentenced over the last decade:

Xu Jiayin, billionaire chairman of the Evergrande Group, lost 98% of his personal fortune after the government insisted he use it to help pay Evergrande’s debts, and was arrested last year and (so far) banned from China’s financial markets for life.

Xiao Jianhua, who was placed under house arrest for corruption and was made to “[cooperate] with the government as it restructured [his] conglomerate.” He was eventually sentenced to thirteen years in prison.

Miles Guo, a billionaire who has appeared prominently in the Western press due to his connections with Steve Bannon, fled China after he was accused of bribery and a warrant was issued for his arrest.

Real estate billionaire Ren Zhiqiang, who was sentenced to eighteen years in prison for embezzling millions in public funds.

Sun Dawu, billionaire owner of a private agricultural corporation, also sentenced to eighteen years for a variety of crimes including “coercive trade, illegal mining, illegal occupation of agricultural land [and] illegal absorption of public deposits.”

Despite this large drop in wealth at the very top, the Chinese economy has continued to grow significantly, and income has continued to rise at the very bottom, during this time. All these things cannot be said of “developed” Western countries.

You don’t see a lot of U.S. billionaires enter the U.S. criminal justice system (the case of Donald Trump is very high-profile, but an outlier). Moreover, over the same period (2021-2024), the wealth of U.S. billionaires INCREASED by 26%, from $4.5 trillion to $5.7 trillion.

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

China's economy is bigger than official GDP statistics indicate, because it uses a measurement system based on manufacturing production, under-counting services. US GDP data, meanwhile, is distorted by expensive "services" like imputed rent and legal fees.

83
1
1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml

Another sitrep collating the latest news. Nothing you wouldn't already know about if you have been following the news closely, but it's useful to have the most relevant new developments all gathered into one place.

The most interesting, as usual, is not so much what is happening in Ukraine, where Russia continues to dismantle the "mother of all proxy armies" in a cool and methodical manner, nor is it the Saudi related rumor referenced in the title, but rather the mounting evidence of deliberate and accelerating dedollarization in BRICS+, and increasing desperation on the part of the collective West as it loses the financial and economic war.

Also, Dmitry Medvedev has yet again escalated his "bad cop" rhetoric to another level, which i personally find very entertaining.

112
I hate ads (lemmygrad.ml)

I hate ads.

That's it. That's all I wanted to say. Just loathe them with a burning passion. More than i do anything else in my day to day life. I feel an urge to scream it into the world every single day just how much i despise ads and whoever invented them.

I hate ads.

I can't escape them. I feel like i'm trapped in a sick psychological torture experiment. Can't even go outside for a walk without seeing them everywhere. This is not how human beings should live.

I hate ads.

Do the people who make ads not feel any shame for what they are doing? Stop trying to sell me your shit, i don't want it! I don't want to give you my money, stop trying to take it away from me!

I hate ads.

10
[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 68 points 2 months ago

Doesn't really matter what you're comfortable with. The fact is that the Al Qassam brigades are the main force of resistance against the genocide in Gaza.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 125 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because he was unshakeably principled as a communist and anti-imperialist, and during his leadership the USSR posed the biggest threat to the global system of capitalism that the world has ever seen. He could not be reclaimed for the purposes of anti-communist propaganda like Trotsky nor relegated to the status of a mere theorist like Marx or an idealist revolutionary like Lenin is sometimes (erroneously) portrayed. Stalin achieved too much in practice for the building of socialism, while the victory of the USSR in WW2 under his leadership gave socialism an immense prestige boost around the world.

In short, he scared the bejeezus out of the bourgeoisie for what he represented and what he could have inspired in people across the world had he not been smeared with the lies of Khrushchev and the anti-communist propaganda of the West (frequently borrowed directly from Nazi anti-Soviet propaganda), so they vowed to forever destroy his image and make sure no one like him would ever arise again.

Sadly, this ploy worked. Thanks to Khrushchev's speech of lies you even had other principled communists (at one point even Che Guevara believed some of the accusations leveled at Stalin) around the world start to doubt what they thought they knew about Stalin and the USSR which caused a worldwide crisis of confidence among communists and a massive split between those parties who accepted the Khrushchevite lies and those who didn't.

Meanwhile in capitalist societies anti-communist indoctrination raised entire generations to internalize the belief that Stalin was equivalent to Hitler and the USSR another Nazi Germany, which destroyed their communist parties as effective political forces and made sure that most remaining communists and socialists would have an almost instinctual aversion to the Marxist-Leninist line and practical revolutionary politics.

This led to Western communists retreating into the realm of purely academic Marxism as an economic and not a revolutionary theory, or into all sorts of schools of pseudo-Marxist radical liberalism (like the "Frankfurt School"), anarchism, ultra-left deviations, or just straight up defect to social democracy.

But i will end this on an optimistic note and remind everyone of what Stalin himself said:

"I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy."

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 55 points 3 months ago

The notion of "wasting money" doesn't really apply to a country that can print the global reserve currency at will. There is effectively no bottom to the money bag for the US.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 57 points 3 months ago

Good. Not that i think Tiktok is that important for China, but it's always nice to stick it to the imperialists.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 87 points 4 months ago

A little reminder of who this fascist CIA asset was: he regularly participated in neo-nazi marches, advocated to strip non-ethnic Russians of their Russian citizenship, and called muslim Chechens "cockroaches".

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 59 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Once a critical mass is reached and the power disparity between the empire and the global south has flipped sufficiently in favor of the latter, it doesn't matter who is perceived as the aggressor by those still under the influence of the imperialist media's propaganda. I believe that Russia's launching of their military operation demonstrates that we have already reached and passed that point. Russia's bold move has opened the flood gates for others in the global resistance to strike blows at the empire and its proxies, but it was essential that someone make the first step to break the illusion of imperial untouchability and invincibility in the same vein as the Palestinian resistance shattered the illusions around the necolonial occupation's viability. Now it is up to each actor in the broader anti-imperialist camp when and how to open their own front against the empire, but imo events are developing such that it is inevitably going to happen at some point. If they don't the empire will force their hand anyway because it still delusionally overestimates its own strength. It's just a matter of time.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 57 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You are either ignorant of history or you have a different definition of what constitutes failure than normal people. State directed economies have been objectively the most successful model in human history for rapidly and as widely as possible improving material conditions.

What has failed in the past and continues to fail is actually the liberal economic model.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 61 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah this is straight up reactionary shit. They say it's not meant to persecute people with different sexual orientations, rather just target "the movement", but wtf does that even mean? How do they even legally define what "the LGBT movement" is? Do they think that people are card-carrying members of some official LGBT organization? This is so vague that it allows basically any interpretation that they decide is politically expedient at any given time.

Depending on public opinion this could range from being virtually a nothing burger that will only be used to go after western sponsored political opposition groups (which would be foreign interference anyway, Russia already has laws for that), all the way to making life a nightmare for queer people and trying to completely erase them from public visibility. Basically what will happen is up to what the mood in the general Russian public is at any given time and how much pushback there is when the government oversteps, but unfortunately at the moment a lot of Russians have very reactionary views on this subject.

The sad part is that i'm not sure that the outcome would be any different even if the ruling party was a communist one, at least if it chose to tail the masses on this issue. It's a difficult problem to solve because a vanguard party should not be tailing the masses but it also should not impose completely unpopular policies that the masses are not yet ready for. The correct thing to do is to prepare the people for more progressive policy with a thorough campaign of education and normalization.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 58 points 9 months ago

"We can totally cut ourselves off from our main source of cheap energy, it totally won't have any negative consequences like everyone with a brain predicted it would."

view more: next ›

cfgaussian

joined 2 years ago