charonn0

The irony is that you're the one failing to bring anything of substance to the discussion. For example, comments consisting solely of insults.

I'll let you get in the last word.

The irony is almost palpable.

It’s amazing that you spent so much energy debating an entirely irrelevant point

Can you believe I even read the lawsuit?! Crazy, I know!

But "charged"? Come on. That's clearly trying to obfuscate that it's a private lawsuit.

What's obvious is that my assessment is probably correct. The lawsuit will fail because the "actual point being made" is not a legal point but a political one. And certainly not a criminal point.

But we're discussing your disagreement with my assessment that "charge" is willfully dishonest.

Just... wow.

It's a civil case.

A civil case is a private, non-criminal lawsuit, usually involving private property rights, including respecting rights stated under the Constitution or under federal or state law.

Which is also why it's doomed to fail.

He was not.

Just recently I was reading about blind people who got experimental eye implants several years ago. They're having serious problems now because the company stopped supporting the implants.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete

I'm disinterested in sports.

Only certain specific reasons can actually disqualify a candidate. For example, age, naturalization, or fomenting an insurrection after having sworn an oath to the US.