check 1995-1996
i'm saying abstaining from beef can't causally decrease ghge
the suggestion that you are a best in class mental gymnast isn’t a thought terminating cliche
it is, and saying it isn't doesn't change that.
by your rationale there would be no way to mention any activity without it being a suggestion that all current recipients must immediately perform said activity,
they are advocating for a set of actions. not simply mentioning them.
Stating something is true with no supporting argument other than “I said so” followed by some shaky(at best) logic doesn’t leave much in the way of conversation points.
that's not what happened. what i said were all truth claims. you can decide whether i was wrong about any of them (i'm not), but no argument at all is needed.
no. i don't think that. but i think the propaganda they've produced can only have that effect.
only people who speak english can read that comment. they are only talking to english-literate people.
edit: ... english-literate people who are on lemmy.
dam. if only there were charts that show meat production and ghge
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/meat-production-tonnes?tab=chart&country=%7EOWID_WRL
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-ghg-emissions?tab=chart&country=%7EOWID_WRL
i'm not pro-natalist, but i am anti-anti-natalist, if there is any room for that.
Only a small subset of people who don’t have kids are antinatalists.
i'm not talking about people who don't have kids. i'm talking about people who advocate for people not to have kids.
Environmentalism is the opposite of fascism
ecofascism is a real phenomenon. there is a cure for political illiteracy.
yes
edit: and the sentiment needs to be conveyed in a way that is equally weighted culturally and linguistically. which is to say there is no method, to my way of thinking, to advocate for antinatalism that is not eugenics.