deranger

joined 2 years ago
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 58 seconds ago

Wonder why they didn’t think of something like this after Katrina? 1833 fatalities in that shit show of a disaster response vs 129 in these latest Texas floods.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You’re right, I can’t say the motive. The evidence points to an intentional cutoff by one of the pilots, however. Maybe it’s an accident, maybe it’s deliberate.

It has nothing to do with their race so fuck off with the racism accusation. I never said a single thing regarding their race or culture, so don’t accuse me of such things.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The far more plausible scenario is someone toggled them both, especially since there was a 1s delay. That’s not something jostling the plane or falling and hitting the switches.

That bulletin says they were potentially installed without the locking feature but to my knowledge these weren’t new switches on the AI flight, nor were there any issues reported on earlier flights.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

The probability of both failing would be the probability of one failing squared. I find this scenario to be far less plausible than someone toggling them, regardless of motive.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

What killed them was a deliberate action by one of the pilots. The motive we may never know, but it doesn't look good either way.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There’s no communication between the two pilots before the switches were moved to cutoff to suggest they encountered any problems prior to fuel cutoff.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

All evidence points to a deliberate toggling of the fuel cutoff switches, and whoever did it then denied they did anything on CVR. It’s not an issue with the plane itself, this is either someone deliberately crashing the plane or someone absentmindedly crashing the plane.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works -4 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

Skilled yes, but apparently concealing a mental health issue. This is a huge cultural issue in aviation. Nobody wants to lose their job, so you just bury it.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

Mentour Pilot did a livestream today, he's also one of the major commercial aviation YouTubers.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?

Even after I pointed out you misquoted me here, you’re still doing it. You’re leaving out a key piece of the quote which is extremely relevant to your frankly ridiculous claim about being responsible for your parent’s child support debt, or other debts to the state.

Dog, you’re the one spewing personal bullshit. You just can’t make a reply without a half dozen personal digs.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Medical debt can be dissolved in probate, just potentially not the kind related to say, nursing homes, assuming you’re in one of those states, and you’re in a rare scenario when they actually enforce it. I’m not responsible for my parents medical debt; I am responsible for their care and medical debt can be a part of that, but not necessarily, as in the pacemaker example I used earlier. That pacemaker example would fall into the same category as other debtors seeing payment from the estate.

There’s no ad hominem in my comments. Quote me, and don’t paraphrase and put quotes around it. Implications are neither here nor there, either. I’m saying you’re wrong because the facts don’t support your points, not because of any personal characteristics you have. A prime example is you mistakenly equating any medical debt to what would be covered under filial responsibility.

”filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”

It is remarkable how you selectively quote what I said. You left out “…to the state”, which is a key part of the point I was making about how a child would never be responsible for their parents child support debt.

Once again, you demonstrate your ignorance of the laws here in the United States, something which you have no experience with, nor any sort of legal expertise. You may want to work on that reading comprehension rather than spending time formatting your text just so.

Medical debt is dismissed in probate insolvency, except in rare cases.

Why are you talking about medical debt? We've already established that it's an exception to this. […] Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?

Dude you contradict yourself in the same paragraph here, lol. Is it an exception or not? For the record, it is dissolved unless it’s debt directly related to care, and only in rare cases is that actually enforced.

 
11
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by deranger@sh.itjust.works to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world
 

Whenever I try to Select Text, it only pops up a few millimeters at the bottom of the screen. I can pull it up a few more and copy the whole text and work with that, but this isn’t how it used to function. I can no longer see the text and select snippets from there to copy.

Voyager 2.29.1, iPhone 14 Pro Max, iOS 18.4

 

1975 Dodge Tradesman 300

108
Cruisin' for Burgers (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by deranger@sh.itjust.works to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

1977 Ford Cruising Van

124
Morning Fungi [OC] (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by deranger@sh.itjust.works to c/pics@lemmy.world
 
 
91
[OC] Sunset (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by deranger@sh.itjust.works to c/pics@lemmy.world
 
view more: next ›