dumnezero

joined 5 months ago
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's too much work... It's a lot and it's chaotic. We've had 3 days of debates too, and George Simion was absent from them (he was on a man date with with Donald Trump Jr.)

The polling organizations we have are traditionally biased (partisan); there are some new pollsters too, but it's not consistent. There is a lot of "vote splitting" going on. Frankly, I think that a lot of people are going to treat it like gambling, like slot machines (a plague here).

Simion seems to be the #1, taking the mantle from Georgescu (who did not give it to him) as the reactionary "anti-system" party (AUR).

Everyone's anti-system now. I mean the politicians too, it's a long-standing grift now for candidates to declare themselves to be anti, despite the opposite.

The "status quo" parties, which are sort of married, are PSD and PNL. They are deeply hated for many good reasons but they promise a kind of slowly deteriorating stability. The problem is that the main alternatives are even worse, but a lot of people think that "any alternative is better". These two parties, along with UDMR (Magyar minority party), are supporting Antonescu. He's likely on position 2 or 3 in preferences. He's a washout politician who can talk well, he came out of political retirement for this. His votes depend on how well these parties can get their bases to vote for him.

Antonescu has used a lot of right-wing conservative discourse in his campaign so far, yet he's from the "DL" party (PNL). It's hard to tell if he's being honest about it, but he sounds almost as bad as the far right ones.

Then we have Nicușor Dan. He's sort of the "golden boy" of Romanian progressives, as he comes from a long career of activism on civic matters and is well regarded in the capital and in the big cities. He's been under attack a lot, which usually means that he's close to getting 2nd place in polls. While he describes himself as a conservative, his political career is about making government work (without corruption) for the people, not for party elites or PPP clienteles, and not for himself. He's a rare kind of politician who's actually trying to strengthen the government (something that the USR party claims to want too, but they don't usually get in power). If he loses, he remains the mayor of the capital (where he's doing a long process of unfucking the Capital's debts, public heating system, and other infrastructure).

Another interesting candidate is Victor Ponta, who's also a "trumpist". He's from the PSD party but left to be an independent. He has ties to Russia and Russia's allies in Europe. He's a clever opportunist who's trying to do realpolitik ironically. It's unclear what his voter base is, so he might get only a few % or a lot of %. Ponta might split the vote from PSD to Antonescu, he represents a certain "camp" in PSD. It's unclear if he takes votes from the far-right "sovreigntists" types who are being wooed by Simion.

If Ponta wins, he might take over PSD or split it and join with AUR (Simion, far-right) in Parliament.

We also have Lasconi who won a surprise 2nd place last year vs Georgescu. That's widely been seen as a protest vote along with some weird shit that PSD and PNL pulled to split their base intentionally and redirect votes to small parties as some proxy undermining strategy (including to Georgescu); she won 2nd place by a very tiny margin. Nevertheless, she let that go to her head and thinks that God wants her to be president now. In the polls, she got way less this time and she's unlikely to even come close to Nicușor Dan, but she shares a good chunk of the base with him. In an weird rational move, her own party leadership (USR) ditched her and called for voting for Nicușor Dan (independent). Nicușor Dan is sort of the godfather of USR, and he has better poll numbers for sure. This has made Lasconi extremely mad and now she's just trying bully and bury Nicușor Dan with every occasion while explaining how much she's a victim of conspiracies. Of course, the status quo parties loved this and are encouraging her, and the not-so-independent BEC (central elections bureau) decided that USR can't drop her so easily and can't support Nicușor Dan.

The rest of the candidates don't have any serious chance and they're either there for their ego or to mess with others. They do not understand the whole politics of "transferring" votes to the better candidate that they'd support; they think it's a popularity contest with low or no stakes. Literally most of the candidates do not understand the stakes and Simion and his party definitely have "euroscepticism" and ROEXIT desires (not official goals, yet).

The recent debates have been good at showing how much they all suck, which is probably why Simion stayed away.

I think that we'll see the "gambler vote" in action especially for reactionary candidates; the people who decide who to vote for very late, maybe in the voting booth. And I bet (sic) that this is going to be impacted by an illegal promotion campaign in the days before the vote and even during the voting day, just like Georgescu did. The infrastructure, the pathways that allowed Georgescu to "come out of nowhere" are still there.

I would actually support turning off social media for a week before the election day. Not for me, for everyone; servers - blocked. The tech bros and their clients have figured out how to hack the masses.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=22597

not GUI, but the CLI looks simple.

If it can't convert to WebP, just make PNGs and convert those to WebP later with something else.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (7 children)

How is the balcony solar pv energy being used exactly? Do people have DC chargers for laptops?

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah, so Russia wants ~~to create rifts between Eastern and Western~~ Europe, got it!

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worked for me, but this needs a lot of development to be a useful tool for analysis, and maybe a browser extension.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 23 points 2 weeks ago

Atheism 📈

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there any browser with account and synchronization - but decentralized? Even just saving local files so I can sync a folder.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

I made the mistake, years ago, of using my favorite song at the time as a ringtone.

To me, it's just a personalized bad news machine.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

“Most of the price-increasing pressures aren’t really controllable by us, so we focus on trying to keep the system fair,” Bolduc said, adding: “The real problem is the math is not good.”

It is somewhat funny that the insurance sector, infamous for being shady, has to play the role of promoting the hard climate facts.

Abandoned McMansions are going to be an interesting sight.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Start subsidizing growing nuts and seeds at the same level as the subsidies for the fishing sector, and let's compare prices then.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A vegan keto diet is hardly possible because of that

They don't do it. It's like I'm talking to a bot.

 

"The Perfect Pedestrian ; or, Making the World Safe for Motocracy."

Cartoon in Punch Magazine, Feb 2, 1927.

 

This is the official episode on YouTube, it may not work in some locations. The relevant segment starts at around 9:00.

I'm posting it here because the Trump regime is making a big point of protecting "Big Tech" interests in Europe. And the moderation challenge presented by Oliver shows why "Big Tech", at least social media, needs to be severely limited, if not kicked out entirely.

It's a conflict and the moderation issue is a key aspect of it because, without moderation, these platforms become superspreaders for scams, misinformation, and divisive & delusional conservative "narratives" (as they call them). It is cyberwarfare and also social engineering, and the Trump regime is demanding maximum deregulation.

From the video description:

John Oliver discusses Facebook’s controversial new plans for content moderation and DOGE’s continued firing of government workers, including some of America’s best dorks: Park rangers.

 

The Arctic region has been a massive store of carbon for thousands of years. Now it's warming between 3 and 7 times faster than the global average and that carbon is escaping into our atmosphere. The latest research suggests that more than a third of it is now a net emitter! And in case you're wondering...that's NOT good!

 

See timecode 3:54

 
 

Source:

radical art and comix from the heart of the city -- worldwar3illustrated.org @ww3illustrated -- facebook.com/worldwar3illustrated

https://worldwar3illustrated-blog.tumblr.com/post/632986384848781312/this-was-my-first-anti-trump-comic-strip-it-was

 
 

Episode of "EU Scream" podcast.

There are many more politicians and policymakers from the far right on our TVs, in our social media feeds, and in our legislatures. They have a new swagger and an even more conspicuous disdain for their adversaries. “They act like they own the place,” observes Raquel García Hermida-van der Valle, a liberal member of the European Parliament for the Dutch D66 party. Two far-right groups, the Patriots and Sovereigntists, still face a so-called cordon sanitaire. But another, the European Conservatives and Reformists, has been welcomed into a right-wing mainstream that includes the party of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. And, in reality, all three far-right groups have much in common, from xenophobia, to distrust of state institutions, and a fixation on free speech.

In this episode: Raquel talks about her recent showdowns with increasingly combative far-right lawmakers including a race-baiting Bulgarian and a conspiracy theorist from Hungary. Raquel speculates that some far-right MEPs have “gone down the rabbit hole” and actually believe the EU is replacing white Christians with Muslims and people of colour. Others, says Raquel, are probably following Steve Bannon’s notorious battle plan, “to flood the zone with shit,” so as to disorient the media and voters. Raquel also talks about how she’s looking to better coordinate with other MEPs to counter a European far right that appears to be growing more openly radical as it grows in size and influence. Also in this episode, snapshots of MEPs from the three far-right blocs: Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Ivan David, Geadis Geadi, Sarah Knafo, Rada Laykova and Jaak Madison.

MP3: https://www.buzzsprout.com/178148/episodes/16539164-ep-112-resisting-nazi-era-narratives-at-the-european-parliament.mp3

 

Having risen out of obscure boards on 4chan and Reddit, the alt-right is a right-wing extremist movement that’s mostly decentralized. Despite this, they have become incredibly pervasive, not through logical argument, but through operating in a way that makes spotting and opposing them particularly tricky. This post shall act as a brief look into some of the tactics they employ, and how leftists can effectively counter them.

  1. The Lulz
  1. Never On The Defensive
  1. I Decide What You Believe
  1. Whataboutism
 

Having risen out of obscure boards on 4chan and Reddit, the alt-right is a right-wing extremist movement that’s mostly decentralized. Despite this, they have become incredibly pervasive, not through logical argument, but through operating in a way that makes spotting and opposing them particularly tricky. This post shall act as a brief look into some of the tactics they employ, and how leftists can effectively counter them.

  1. The Lulz
  1. Never On The Defensive
  1. I Decide What You Believe
  1. Whataboutism
 

New elements include DOGE’s feed from X, Musk’s social network, and a blank section for savings identified by the agency, promised to be updated “no later than” Valentine’s Day. At the top of the website’s regulations page, DOGE used data published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a libertarian think tank that claims to fight “climate alarmism.”

The CEI’s “unconstitutionality index,” which it started in 2003, compares regulations or rules introduced by government agencies with laws enacted by Congress.

The CEI claims to fight “climate alarmism,” and has long worked to block climate-focused policies, successfully lobbying against the ratification of the international climate treaty the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as well as the enactment of the 2009 Waxman-Markey bill, which aimed to place a cap on greenhouse gas emissions.

view more: ‹ prev next ›