Superhero with a shoulder mounted missile launcher like War Machine but they're Hawkeye's patented boxing glove missiles
exocrinous
Constant Nobles.
Does it have a headphone jack
Well, yes and no. Yes, if your child is in need you have a duty to support them. But no, children should not need to rely on child support from an unwilling parent. Becoming a parent is a really big decision, and a lot of people are parents against their will, whether that be because of poor sex education, poor access to contraceptives, laws against abortion, or simply a partner who doesn't agree. The government should be providing enough money for a kid to live on and have a good life. That's how we do it in my country and it's better than America.
A lot of people have sex in a state where they shouldn't be held responsible for that decision for a lifetime. Whether it be violent rape, coercive rape, getting drunk, or just being a dumb kid who doesn't know any better. Nobody should be having one night of poor decision making at 17 and paying for that choice at 35. And it's really really important that people who are raped not be paying for it. I read that story from America where a high schooler was raped by his teacher and had to pay child support. Now, we can either subject rape victims to the beaurocracy of proving to the government that they didn't consent, which is a degrading and triggering process, or the government can take responsibility for looking after ALL its citizens and pay for the raising of all unwanted children. Hell, pay for the raising of the wanted ones too, alleviate the burdens of all parents! There's enough money.
In an enlightened society, the idea of an individual paying "child support" would be seen as absurd and backward, because all children would be supported by the whole community just for being born. And also abortion would be legal and sex ed would be very comprehensive.
I agree with you, electric bikes belong on the road.
.... after all cars are banned
Spitz conveniently ignoring that they told people there's nothing wrong with the PSN connectivity and that the players are all a bunch of big whiners. They may have done a heel face turn, but they still have to deal with the consequences of their actions as a heel.
It is a shame that those story relevant events are inaccessible, but I never played them, and I understand things perfectly well. The bosses' assassination missions explain their deal very succinctly. Salad is a sadistic tech CEO. Regor is a sexy geneticist. Kela runs the prize fights. The Sergeant is a punk ass bitch. The only weird boss is Sargus Ruk, now that the Tenno have been rewritten as superheroes instead of mercenaries. Oh, and corrupted Vor, but he's such a meme he doesn't need to make sense. He's funny anyway.
I also got back into the game after a long hiatus and it's fun. The new story stuff is great. One of my friends had a similar reaction to you to The Second Dream, but there's a 2016 quest called The War Within that really fleshes out and redeems that writing choice and now my friend likes the Second Dream reveal.
This post is mostly just complaining that putting the new story quests in front of the old story quests breaks continuity.
What if Amazon sold TTS voice packages that can read any novel in your catalogue? "Hello yes I would like the James Earl Jones voice package and every Star Wars book ever written please." But the existing audiobook storefront still had only audiobooks read by real people in it, protecting their jobs.
You seen the Black Mirror episode where she makes a robot of her dead husband?
People need to process their grief and move on. It's important. You use AI to create a world where people never grieve, you'll create a world that never moves on. Never improves. Stuck in the past, trying endlessly to recapture something that doesn't exist in the present and cannot grow in the future.
There's an AI tool that lets you talk to your ex. You put in your chats, it creates an AI of your ex, and you can talk to them, even date them. Thing is, it's a business. They want your money. They're going to exploit you sooner or later. Imagine how much bigger the market is with lost loved ones. Capitalists should NOT be selling love. It's dangerous.
Let me rephrase the issue for you and see if you have a different emotional reaction.
A person's job was replaced with a capitalist's robot, and now the capitalist earns all the money.
I don't see any funny letters here